 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| . |  |
. |
 By Marc BURLEIGH and Alex PIGMAN Brussels (AFP) Nov 10, 2021
Google lost an appeal on Wednesday against a 2.4-billion-euro ($2.8-billion) fine imposed by the European Union for abusing its search engine dominance -- a big win for the bloc's anti-trust tussle with the tech titan. The ruling by the Luxembourg-based General Court confirmed the landmark decision taken by the European Commission in 2017. The matter could be challenged again, however, if Google decides to turn to the EU's highest court, the European Court of Justice, for a final say. "Today's judgment delivers the clear message that Google's conduct was unlawful and it provides the necessary legal clarity for the market," the European Commission said in a statement. The case centres on Google's shopping service and is one of three against the search engine giant currently moving through the EU's drawn-out appeals system. At the time, the fine was the EU's biggest ever. But it was later exceeded by a 4.3-billion-euro fine against Google over its Android smartphone operating system. In its appeal, Google and its parent company Alphabet had argued the EU was "wrong on the law, the facts, and the economics" in the search engine case. But the court said it dismissed "for the most part the action brought by the two companies, and upholds the fine imposed by the Commission". It said that, by favouring its own Google Shopping service over rivals in its search result rankings and positioning, "Google departed from competition on the merits". It rejected Google's argument that big online retailers had their own internet sites, saying that "those platforms are not on the same market" in which users go comparison shopping. A Google spokesperson said the company will examine the ruling. "This judgment relates to a very specific set of facts and while we will review it closely, we made changes back in 2017 to comply with the European Commission's decision," the spokesperson said. "Our approach has worked successfully for more than three years, generating billions of clicks for more than 700 comparison shopping services." While Google was dealt a setback in the EU, the company fended off a separate legal case in Britain on Wednesday as the Supreme Court blocked a $4 billion class-action lawsuit accusing it of illegally tracking millions of iPhone users. - Big win for Brussels - The Luxembourg ruling is a win for the EU's anti-trust supremo Margrethe Vestager, who burst onto the scene in Brussels by scrapping her predecessor's more conciliatory approach to the US internet giant. Vestager had lost in the same court in a different major case, against Apple and Ireland, in which her teams had ordered the iPhone maker to repay 13 billion euros plus interest to the Irish taxpayer. The EU has appealed that ruling. The fine for Google came after seven years of investigation launched by complaints from other price-comparison services that saw traffic plummet against Google Shopping. Experts believe that, if it is not overturned on later appeal, Google's similar forays into vacation rentals and job ads could be next in the EU commission's firing line. Along with paying the fine, Google was told to remedy the problem identified by the EU case, even as the appeal moved forward. The company tweaked its search display to give more prominence to rival shopping aggregators, as well as tourist and travel advice sites such as Tripadvisor and Yelp. - 'Virtually invisible' - But many rivals are deeply dissatisfied with Google's fixes, believing they do nothing to guarantee fair competition in search results. "What really matters... is stopping Google from repeating its behaviour in the future and protecting European consumers," said Richard Stables, from price-comparison site Kelkoo. The European Consumer Organisation (BEUC) said Google's "misleading and unfair practices harmed millions of European consumers by ensuring that rival comparison shopping services were virtually invisible." "In light of the ruling, we ask the European Commission to ensure that Google does not abuse its dominance as a search engine by giving its own services preference in other areas," said BEUC director general Monique Goyens. The commission, the EU's anti-trust enforcer, is preparing legislation expected for next year that would impose tough rules on Big Tech. One of the laws, the Digital Markets Act, sets a clear list of Do's and Don'ts for internet "gatekeepers" that includes drastic limits on how Google, or other giants, can squeeze out rivals on their platforms.
Europe's battle to curb Big Tech A European Union court on Wednesday rejected a Google appeal against a 2.4-billion euro ($2.8-billion) anti-trust fine. Here is how the bloc has tried to regulate Big Tech: - Nobbling competition - The digital giants -- collectively dubbed GAFAM -- are regularly criticised for dominating the market by elbowing out rivals. The EU has slapped a total 8.25 billion euros in fines on Google for abusing its dominant market position across several of its products. The EU's General Court in Luxembourg on Wednesday confirmed a 2.4-billion-euro fine imposed on Google by the EU Commission in 2017 for abusing its power over its rivals in online shopping. It rejected the US search engine giant's appeal, ruling that the Commission was right and "Google departed from competition on the merits". Microsoft was fined 561 million euros by the EU in 2013 for imposing its search engine Internet Explorer on users of Windows 7. Amazon, Apple and Facebook are also the targets of EU probes for possible violations of competition rules. The EU has also unveiled plans for mammoth fines of up to 10 percent of sales on tech firms that break competition rules, which could even lead to them being broken up. - Taxation - Germany, France, Italy and Spain won a major victory in June when the Group of Seven (G7) agreed to a minimum global corporate tax rate of at least 15 percent mainly aimed at the tech giants. For years they have paid little or no tax through complex tax avoidance schemes. In one of the most notorious cases, the European Commission in 2016 found that Ireland granted "illegal tax benefits to Apple" and ordered the company to pay 13 billion euros plus interest to the Irish taxpayer. After an EU court later ruled in favour of Apple, the Commission turned to the European Court of Justice to appeal. The following year, Amazon was told to pay back 250 million euros to Luxembourg over similar alleged abuses there, though the EU General Court cancelled that in May this year. An appeal will be examined by the European Court of Justice. - Personal data - Tech giants are regularly criticised over how they gather and use personal data. The EU has led the charge to rein them in with its 2018 General Data Protection Regulation, which has since become an international reference. They must ask for consent when they collect personal information and may no longer use data collected from several sources to profile users against their will. Amazon was fined 746 million euros in July by Luxembourg authorities for flouting the EU's data protection rules. After having fined Twitter nearly half a million euros, the Irish regulator opened a probe into Facebook in April after the personal data of 530 million users was pirated. France has also fined Google and Amazon a total of 135 million euros for breaking rules on computer cookies. - Fake news and hate speech - Social networks are often accused of failing to rein in misinformation and hate speech. The European Parliament and member states agreed to force platforms to remove terrorist content, and to do so within one hour. EU rules now also forbid using algorithms to spread false information and hate speech, which some major platforms are suspected of doing to increase ad revenue. - Paying for content - GAFAM are accused by media outlets of making money from journalistic content without sharing the revenue. To tackle this an EU law in 2019 created a form of copyright called "neighbouring rights" that would allow outlets to demand compensation for use of their content. After initial resistance, Google signed agreements to pay for content with several French newspapers last year, a world first. However, it did not stop the company being fined half-a-billion euros by France's competition authority in July for failing to negotiate "in good faith" with news organisations. Google has appealed.
Mobile payments firm Paytm kicks off India's biggest IPO Mumbai (AFP) Nov 8, 2021 India's biggest-ever initial public offering opens Monday with digital payments platform Paytm looking to raise nearly $2.5 billion, in what has already been a record year for share listings. Paytm is backed by Chinese tycoon Jack Ma's Ant Group, Japan's SoftBank and Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway, which together own around a third of the company. The firm was founded barely a decade ago by Vijay Shekhar Sharma, the son of a schoolteacher who says he learned English by listening to rock mus ... read more
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
| The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2024 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. All articles labeled "by Staff Writers" include reports supplied to Space Media Network by industry news wires, PR agencies, corporate press officers and the like. Such articles are individually curated and edited by Space Media Network staff on the basis of the report's information value to our industry and professional readership. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Statement Our advertisers use various cookies and the like to deliver the best ad banner available at one time. All network advertising suppliers have GDPR policies (Legitimate Interest) that conform with EU regulations for data collection. By using our websites you consent to cookie based advertising. If you do not agree with this then you must stop using the websites from May 25, 2018. Privacy Statement. Additional information can be found here at About Us. |
del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Google
