 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| . |  |
. |
 By Rob Lever Washington (AFP) June 4, 2019
Big Tech firms are facing an antitrust onslaught in Washington, including reported probes of monopoly abuse by regulators and at least one congressional investigation. Here are three questions and answers on how these actions may play out: - What is the basis for antitrust actions against Big Tech? Each firm has different issues, but any probes could center on whether they abused their dominant position and stifled competition. Google may face questions on whether its search results favor its own services to the detriment of rivals. It has also faced charges in Europe of requiring its partners to use its ad platform, and of using its dominant Android mobile system to favor Google apps. For Facebook, Amazon and Apple, the cases are less clear, although each of them dominated important market segments. European Union officials have begun looking into whether Amazon discriminates against third-party sellers on its platform. Democratic presidential candidate Elizabeth Warren has argued that Apple should not be able to run its App Store with its own services that compete against rivals such as Spotify, which has filed an EU complaint. But experts argue that US law, as widely interpreted in recent years, requires that any case showd harm to consumers, a higher standard than in Europe. Any monopoly litigation would be the first since the Microsoft case brought in the 1990s. "It definitely will be an uphill battle," said Christopher Sagers, a professor of antitrust at the Cleveland-Marshall College of Law. "The federal courts have become quite conservative on antitrust in recent years as has the Supreme Court." - What happens now? - The tech firms could face investigations from both the US Justice Department and Federal Trade Commission, as well as hearings on competition in the House Judiciary Committee which has begun an investigation. Avery Gardiner, a former Justice Department antitrust lawyer and now a competition fellow at the Center for Democracy & Technology, said these agencies constantly review practices of tech firms, but that the recent dividing up of responsibility may signal a more serious posture. "It sends a signal there is growing impatience for the regulators to start bringing some cases, but it doesn't change the underlying standard," Gardiner said. Under normal circumstances, any major antitrust action could take many years to complete, analysts said. "An investigation can take one to two years, then a trial can drag on for a long time, and there will be appeals after that," said Blair Levin, a former Federal Communications Commission attorney who is a Brookings Institution fellow. "In that time you will have a presidential election, so a lot of things could change during the process." The process could be streamlined because the EU cases have created a "road map" for US regulators, according to University of Tennessee law professor Maurice Stucke. The legislative hearings will not be part of any enforcement action, but could uncover evidence that embarrasses the tech firms and eventually becomes part of an antitrust case. Lawmakers may also review US antitrust standards in an effort to update laws for the digital era. "It's not clear whether those hearings have specific practices they want to address or if there is just a general unease" about Big Tech, Levin said. Still, any public hearings could shine a light on tech business practices and whip up public support for enforcement ahead of the 2020 US elections. But critics of the antitrust push say monopoly laws are not suited to dealing with the troubling issues of data protection or privacy, which may be part of a separate legislative effort. - What about a breakup? - US antitrust law allows for "structural" remedies such as a breakup of a monopoly, but this has only happened twice since the Sherman Act was passed in 1890. Those cases were the 1911 breakup of Standard Oil and the 1982 split of American Telephone & Telegraph. In the Microsoft case, a judge ordered a breakup of the software giant but that was reversed on appeal. Courts may also impose a variety of "behavioral" remedies such as allowing rivals better access to platforms' technology and a ban on anti-competitive conduct, although these can be complicated to enforce. "It's highly unlikely that these companies ever get broken up," Levin said. "That is a very hard case to make. It takes a long time and by the time you would get to that, something else will happen" to change the marketplace, he added. Gardiner said that while courts prefer structural rather than behavioral remedies, regulators would need to make a clear case on how a breakup might address competitive harm. "They need to articulate the problem they're trying to solve and how a breakup would fix that," she said. "It might just result in two large behemoths in different parts of the industry."
US gears up for antitrust battles with Big Tech Washington (AFP) June 3, 2019 The US administration is stepping up scrutiny of Big Tech firms, which could result in a series of drawn-out legal battles aimed at reining in - and potentially breaking up - giants such as Google, Amazon and Facebook. The Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission have carved out territory for the investigations to set the stage for reviews of the dominance of the largest of the Silicon Valley firms, media reports said. According to the Wall Street Journal, the Justice Department will ... read more
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
| The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2024 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. All articles labeled "by Staff Writers" include reports supplied to Space Media Network by industry news wires, PR agencies, corporate press officers and the like. Such articles are individually curated and edited by Space Media Network staff on the basis of the report's information value to our industry and professional readership. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Statement Our advertisers use various cookies and the like to deliver the best ad banner available at one time. All network advertising suppliers have GDPR policies (Legitimate Interest) that conform with EU regulations for data collection. By using our websites you consent to cookie based advertising. If you do not agree with this then you must stop using the websites from May 25, 2018. Privacy Statement. Additional information can be found here at About Us. |
del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Google
