by Brooks Hays
Washington (UPI) Sep 19, 2017
The risks of drone-human collisions vary widely, researchers at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University found in a new comprehensive survey.
If drones are to take on more tasks, including package delivery, traffic management and more, the unmanned aircraft systems will have to fly over humans, raising the risk of drone-human collisions. But what do those risks actually entail? What might they look like?
The latest study offers answers to those questions -- questions regulators at the Federal Aviation Administration and elsewhere are likely to pose as they consider whether or not to grant UASs greater access to airspace.
Using a crash test dummy, Virginia Tech researchers analyzed the potential risk of head and neck injuries posed by three commercially available drones in various impact scenarios. The dummy was outfitted with sensors to measure acceleration and force during the different impacts.
Researchers flew the three aircraft at full speed into the dummy's head at different angles. They also dropped the aircraft onto the dummy's head at various orientations.
Scientists used the acceleration and force measurements to estimate the risk of severe or life-threatening injuries, like a skull fracture. The smallest and lightest of the three drones, weighing just 1.2 kilograms, presented only a 10 percent risk of severe injury. The largest drone, weighing more than 11 kilograms, presented a 70 percent risk.
"There's a wide range of risk," Steven Rowson, an assistant professor of biomedical engineering and mechanics, said in a news release. "In some instances it was low, and in some instances it was high, and there are lessons we can take away from that to reduce injury risk in a deliberate way through product design."
Rowson has previously lead research into the risks of impact scenarios for automotive and sports industries. Rowson and his colleagues hope their findings can help set guidelines for reducing the risk of drone-human collision injuries.
The new analysis -- published this week in the journal Annals of Biomedical Engineering -- suggests injury risks can be mitigated if drones are designed to fracture and break upon impact.
"If you reduce the energy that's able to be transferred to be head, you reduce the injury risk," said doctoral student Eamon Campolettano. "The overarching goal for manufacturers should be to limit energy transfer."
While the latest research suggests there are some smaller drones that are already safe enough to take on commercial duties, the study was less about evaluating specific models and more about establishing a baseline for how to carry out risk assessments for drone-human impacts. In the future, researchers will look more intimately at the risks of different makes and models, as well as the benefits of various risk mitigation strategies.
Risk can't be eliminated entirely. So the questions is: how much risk will the FAA tolerate, and how can companies reduce risks to acceptable levels?
"How much proof does the FAA need before they say, 'Yes, that's okay'?" asked Mark Blanks, director of the Virginia Tech Mid-Atlantic Aviation Partnership. "Once those standards are in place, we're going to see huge expansion in the industry."
Washington (UPI) Sep 15, 2017
China is displaying its unmanned reconnaissance and attack helicopter drone to possible foreign military buyers at an exhibition in Tianjin. The aircraft is the AV500W, a 24.6-feet long autonomous aircraft developed and produced at the AVIC Helicopter Research and Development Institute. The drone has a flight ceiling of about 13,000 feet, a maximum speed of about 105 miles per ho ... read more
UAV News - Suppliers and Technology
|The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2017 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. All articles labeled "by Staff Writers" include reports supplied to Space Media Network by industry news wires, PR agencies, corporate press officers and the like. Such articles are individually curated and edited by Space Media Network staff on the basis of the report's information value to our industry and professional readership. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. Privacy Statement|