. 24/7 Space News .
US Public's View Of Energy Sources, Preferences and Environmental Issues Assessed

Close to two-thirds of respondents oppose the idea of locating a carbon capture and sequestration facility (an underground site that contains carbon dioxide gas extracted from coal) within 25 miles of their residences, and 75% oppose construction of either a coal-burning power plant or nuclear power plant nearby.
by Staff Writers
Menlo Park CA (SPX) Jul 31, 2007
While only two percent of the public indicates that energy is the most important problem facing the U.S. today, the results of a new MIT study based on data from Knowledge Networks offer a compelling snapshot of the public's declining satisfaction with oil for energy, as well as an openness toward alternative energy sources. Study findings highlight viewpoints on coal, dams, natural gas, nuclear power, oil, solar and wind.

From February 23 to March 4, 2007, a random sample of 1,200 online respondents took the same survey that Knowledge Networks administered for MIT in 2002 using a similar sampling methodology. Both studies were conducted on KnowledgePanel(SM) -- the only available probability selected, nationally representative Internet panel.

The general opinion of the U.S. public is:

+ 63% favor somewhat/much stronger environmental regulations
+ 36% indicate global warming is the most important U.S. environmental problem
+ 43% say that some action should be taken on global warming

When asked how harmful they think each power source is, the following percentage of the public indicates that the source is "very harmful:"

+ Coal              29%
+ Dams               3%
+ Natural Gas        5%
+ Nuclear           37%
+ Oil               24%
+ Solar              2%
+ Wind               2%

In the most recent MIT survey, 74% of respondents say they want to decrease use of oil, whereas clear majorities would choose to increase use of solar and wind "a lot" -- a finding in line with 2002. However, when respondents are given purchase price information on solar and wind, their responses reveal diminished support for these energy sources.

Respondents also had reservations about some energy by-products. Close to two-thirds of respondents oppose the idea of locating a carbon capture and sequestration facility (an underground site that contains carbon dioxide gas extracted from coal) within 25 miles of their residences, and 75% oppose construction of either a coal-burning power plant or nuclear power plant nearby.

Perceived environmental harm has the largest effect on support for a given fuel type, especially for coal and nuclear power. However, despite growing public concern over climate change, one finding has not changed since 2002: only a remote connection exists in the public's mind between electricity generation and global warming.

The survey is part of the MIT Energy Initiative. A more extensive working paper is available at the MIT Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research and the MIT Public Opinion Research Training Lab.

Community
Email This Article
Comment On This Article

Related Links
Knowledge Networks
Powering The World in the 21st Century at Energy-Daily.com



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


China To Step Up Energy Efficiency Drive
Beijing (AFP) Jul 28, 2007
China has announced plans to double spending on improving energy efficiency and slashing pollution, in an effort to combat its dismal environmental record. The government will spend an extra 10 billion yuan (1.33 billion US dollars) on reducing energy use and cutting pollution, according to a statement from the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC), the state body responsible for economic planning.







  • Houston Wine Company Offers Wine Discount To NASA Astronauts
  • Udall Says House NASA Budget A Step In The Right Direction
  • NASA Faces Congress Scrutiny As Russia Denies US Astronauts Had Chance To Booze
  • NASA Jolted By Boozing Astronauts And Sabotage

  • Weather Delays Phoenix Mars Probe Launch
  • US-Canadian Team On 4-Month Simulated Mars Mission
  • Impact Craters In Tyrrhena Terra
  • Phoenix Hits The Pad

  • India Plans To Double Satellite Launches Within Five Years
  • Russian Space Firm Signs 14 Deals For Commercial Rocket Launches
  • Spaceway 3 Is Delivered To The Spaceport For Its Mid-August Ariane 5 Launch
  • Sea Launch To Resume Zenit Launches In October

  • ESA Mission Highlighted At Remote Sensing Conference
  • Third Sino-Brazilian EO Satellite To Be Launched By October
  • Ball Aerospace Prepares To Ship WorldView I
  • DigitalGlobe Expands Commercial Imagery Distribution Network In Australia And New Zealand

  • Charon: An Ice Machine In The Ultimate Deep Freeze
  • New Horizons Slips Into Electronic Slumber
  • Nap Before You Sleep For Your Cruise Into The Abyss Of Outer Sol
  • The Dwarf Planet Known As Eris Is More Massive Than Pluto

  • Japanese And Nasa Satellites Unveil New Type Of Active Galaxy
  • Arizona Team Discovers Supergiant Star Spews Molecules Needed For Life
  • Interstellar Chemistry Gets More Complex With New Charged-Molecule Discovery
  • First Pulsar Detection With LOFAR Station

  • Throttling Back To The Moon
  • Moonshine Can Reflect Lunar Composition
  • Northrop Grumman Helps NASA Shape Plans For Affordable Lunar Lander
  • Summer Moon Illusion

  • Salco Technologies Obtains Intrinsically Safe UL913 Certifications For Remote Monitoring Equipment
  • T-Mobile Austria Customers Can Now Avoid Becoming Lost With GPS SatNav From TeleNav
  • Cell Phones And PDAs Revolutionize How Consumers Find Homes On REALTOR.com
  • ShoZu One-Click Image Upload Service To Be Embedded In Samsung Handsets

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2007 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement