. 24/7 Space News .
Apollo's Lunar Leftovers

illustration only

 Washington - Jul 05, 2004
By the time NASA's Apollo Program came to a close in December 1972, six crews of astronauts, six Apollo command modules, and more than 800 pounds of Moon rocks and lunar soil had been brought back to Earth. But some things were intentionally left behind.

Apollos 11, 12 and 14 through 17 each landed successfully in a different region of the Moon, and evidence of our visit remains at each landing site. There are portions of six spindly Lunar Modules, three electric Lunar Roving Vehicles and an array of scientific instruments.

Weight limits forced so much material to be left on the Moon. "The more they threw out, the more rocks they could bring back," explained Stan Starr, deputy project director and chief engineer with Dynamac at NASA's Kennedy Space Center in Florida.

The lower half of the Lunar Module (the descent stage) allowed the crew to land on the Moon and served as a launch pad when crews left the lunar surface. An American flag was implanted at each landing site, and commemorative plaques were affixed to one leg of each Lunar Module bearing the message that humans from Earth visited with peaceful intentions.

Apollo science was dedicated largely to lunar geology. Seismometers, instruments that detect and measure moonquakes and meteor impacts, were left by each lunar landing crew.

Once they were no longer needed, the Lunar Module ascent stages were deliberately aimed at the lunar surface to provide scientists with a controlled seismic event.

Other instruments monitored lunar gravity changes and temperatures beneath the surface. A wide variety of geological tools, such as long-handled scoops, core tubes and other gear also were discarded.

The lunar crews even left behind most of their cameras, through which millions of people shared in these missions from Earth, and conserved space by bringing home only the film. Apollo 16 also left a gold-plated extreme ultraviolet telescope that performed the first astronomical observations from another heavenly body.

Apollos 11, 14 and 15 left behind Laser Ranging RetroReflectors that are still working after three decades. These arrays provide information about the distance to the Moon and how that distance expands over time. The reflectors are so small that aiming lasers at them from Earth is like using a rifle to hit a moving dime two miles away.

The astronauts had some fun, too. Alan Shepard, commander of Apollo 14, hit three golf balls that still remain in the Moon's Fra Mauro region. His first two shots didn't fare well, but his third swing sent the ball sailing for "miles and miles and miles," Shepard reported.

The nation's Vision for Space Exploration calls for NASA to return to the Moon as a stepping stone toward Mars and beyond. Could any of the abundant materials left on the Moon from the Apollo Program have any use?

"Astronauts could potentially replace the batteries in the rovers and reuse them, if their gears and other moving parts are not full of dust," Starr said.

"Perhaps they could recharge the oxygen and carbon dioxide scrubbers in the Apollo backpacks, or get some use out of the helmets and gloves. But after all this time on the surface, dust could have gotten into everything. Use of this equipment would require careful analysis and planning, since it wasn't designed to be reused."

In the meantime, the hardware we left behind will remain exactly where we left it, waiting in the dusty silence for us to return.

Related Links
SpaceDaily
Search SpaceDaily
Subscribe To SpaceDaily Express



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


New Moon Shot Not So Costly
Washington (UPI) Jun 02, 2004
NASA's plan to fulfill President George W. Bush's space exploration effort suggests the agency will have to spend about $64 billion over the next 15 years to send U.S. astronauts back to the moon.







  • Develop Standards for Orbital Debris Mitigation
  • Analysis Reinventing NASA Is Only Phase One
  • Low Tech, Great Engineers Boost Baikonur
  • Future Bright For Baikonur Cosmodrome

  • Spirit Update: Just A Little RAT
  • Opportunity Update: Ravenous Rock Abrasion Tool
  • Opportunity Update: RAT Hops From Virginia To London
  • Basic RNA Enzyme Research Promises Single-Molecule Biosensors

  • Sea Launch Delivers Telstar 18 To Orbit
  • Russia's Satan Soars For Peaceful Profit
  • Sea Launch At Equator, Preparing For Telstar 18 Mission
  • Air Force Selects ILS' Atlas V For Space Test Program Mission

  • NASA Satellite Captures Twin Typhoons
  • Scientists Confront The Arctic In Support Of ESA's Ice Mission
  • Virtual Compute Helps With Swift Disaster Recovery
  • Myanmar To Conduct Agricultural Census Through Satellite

  • SWAP To Determine Where The Sun And Ice Worlds Meet
  • Hubble Fails To Spot Suspected Sedna Moon
  • Life Beneath The Ice In The Outer Solar System?
  • Gravity Rules: The Nature of Planethood

  • NASA Researchers Consider Mobile Lunar Base Concepts
  • SMART-1 Finds Small Thrust Level Oscillations Help
  • China's Lunar Probe Will Launch On Long March 3A
  • Cornell Astronomer Explains To Congress The Economics Of Lunar Water Supplies

  • Apollo's Lunar Leftovers
  • New Moon Shot Not So Costly
  • Armstrong Reflects On A New Visions For Space Exploration
  • Sunny lunar mountain good site for base

  • Comet Tracker Keeps The Mobile Workforce In Tune
  • GlobeTrac Offers New In-Vehicle GPS/GPRS System
  • Bulldog To Protect Oil Tankers In The Middle East
  • Terion Launches Its Fleetview 3 Trailer Management Product

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2006 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA PortalReports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additionalcopyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement