DirecTV Deal "Filled With Contradictions" Says Rural TV Lobby Group

SPACEMART

EchoStar DirecTV Deal Is Filled With Contradictions Says Lobby Group

NRTC supports more than 1,000 rural utilities in delivering telecommunications and information technology solutions to their communities. NRTC's members and affiliates provide direct broadcast satellite (DBS) equipment and DIRECTV programming services to more than 1.8 million subscribers. NRTC is the 10th largest television programming provider in the United States, and the largest provider of satellite television to rural homes, including households with no other television access to information and entertainment. NRTC also provides members Ku-band satellite Internet equipment and services for high-speed access to the Internet, regardless of location.

Herndon - Apr 5, 2002
The two dominant satellite TV companies have failed to demonstrate how their proposed merger is in the public interest and have instead shown a disturbing tendency to contradict on core consumer protection issues, the National Rural Telecommunications Cooperative (NRTC) said.

In extensive comments filed today with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), NRTC urged the agency to reject the proposed merger of EchoStar Communications and Hughes Electronics (DirecTV), citing severe implications for consumers.

NRTC, a leading advocate for rural consumers, responded specifically to a litany of inaccurate and contradictory claims made by the companies in recent months. The centerpiece of the NRTC document is a six-page "Flip-Flop Chart" that documents at least 22 occasions on which the companies made conflicting statements about material issues central to the merger. For example:

Local TV channels: In their February 25 filing to the FCC, and again in a March 6 news conference and Congressional hearing, the companies pledged to deliver local broadcast TV channels in all 210 designated market areas (DMAs) in the United States. But on March 7, EchoStar and allied groups filed a brief with the U.S. Supreme Court seeking to overturn the local carriage requirement and stating in a footnote that "the merged entity does not intend to carry all channels in every market" unless the law is upheld. The fact is, it is already technically and economically feasible to provide local stations in all 210 markets; they don't need the merger to do this.
Monopoly pricing power: EchoStar and DirecTV have promised a "national pricing plan" to allay concerns about their monopoly pricing power in areas without cable TV. Yet the companies have also openly acknowledged they need "flexibility" in pricing at the local level. And to be effective, a national pricing scheme would need to apply to every aspect of the service, including installation and equipment, to be effective. The companies have not proposed such a plan because it would be unworkable.
Availability of cable TV: EchoStar and DirecTV argue the merger will not create a monopoly for multi-channel TV service, based on the inaccurate claim that nearly 100% of television households have access to a cable TV option. But just two years ago, EchoStar acknowledged that "millions" of homes do not have access to cable. The New York Times, citing several independent, authoritative sources, has estimated the number of American homes not passed by cable at 25 million, and in August 2001, DirecTV itself estimated the number at 35 million.
Competition versus cable: EchoStar and DirecTV argue that they must merge in order to compete and even survive against the cable giants, but the evidence suggests otherwise. Since 1997, DBS subscribership has tripled while cable's penetration rate has dropped by 9%. And in statements to investors, a DirecTV executive said that if the merger were denied, his company, even without the merger, would continue to be "a very strong company with many new strategic options."

"The number and frequency of contradictory, inaccurate statements made by these companies on core issues is simply astonishing," said NRTC President and CEO Bob Phillips. "These statements were made at various times to various audiences, but regulators should not be fooled. The FCC should take this pattern of behavior into consideration when it decides whether this merger should be permitted. NRTC has pointed out repeatedly the numerous problems this merger poses for rural consumers including higher prices, less service, no choices and less innovation."

SPACEMART

EchoStar Asks Supreme Court To Protect Rights Of TV Viewers

Littleton - Apr 03, 2002
EchoStar, through constitutional scholar Laurence Tribe, this week asked the United States Supreme Court to protect the free speech right of all Americans to choose the television programs they want to watch.

Thanks for being here; We need your help. The SpaceDaily news network continues to grow but revenues have never been harder to maintain. With the rise of Ad Blockers, and Facebook - our traditional revenue sources via quality network advertising continues to decline. And unlike so many other news sites, we don't have a paywall - with those annoying usernames and passwords. Our news coverage takes time and effort to publish 365 days a year. If you find our news sites informative and useful then please consider becoming a regular supporter or for now make a one off contribution.
SpaceDaily Contributor $5 Billed Once credit card or paypal		SpaceDaily Monthly Supporter $5 Billed Monthly paypal only

The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2016 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. Privacy Statement All images and articles appearing on Space Media Network have been edited or digitally altered in some way. Any requests to remove copyright material will be acted upon in a timely and appropriate manner. Any attempt to extort money from Space Media Network will be ignored and reported to Australian Law Enforcement Agencies as a potential case of financial fraud involving the use of a telephonic carriage device or postal service.