. | . |
EchoStar Asks Supreme Court To Protect Rights Of TV Viewers
EchoStar, through constitutional scholar Laurence Tribe, this week asked the United States Supreme Court to protect the free speech right of all Americans to choose the television programs they want to watch. Current law provides that consumers can only have access to their local network channels, and prohibits Americans from watching local news and information originating from other areas of the country. EchoStar believes this law violates the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. In its filing, EchoStar asks the Supreme Court to overturn a September 2001 ruling by the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit which upheld the constitutionality of the statute at issue. EchoStar believes that Americans have the right, under the First Amendment, to watch satellite television programming of their own choosing in the same way that Americans have the right to choose the books or newspapers they read or the movies they watch. Today, consumers living outside of New York are permitted to subscribe to their local newspaper as well as the N.Y. Times, Washington Post or other newspapers across the country, yet those same consumers are denied access to New York television news. The technology necessary to make those channels available outside of the New York television market exists today, but EchoStar is prohibited by law from making that news and information available outside of New York. Even Congressional members are today prevented by this antiquated law from monitoring TV news coverage from their home states while working in their offices in Washington, D.C. Satellite TV technology can provide local TV channels to consumers across the entire United States, rather than the limited reach broadcast channels have today. EchoStar has already committed, following approval of its pending merger with Hughes Electronics Corp., to offer local TV channels in all 210 television markets in the United States, including Alaska and Hawaii. By combining this plan with the ability to offer distant network TV stations, consumers would have greater choice in what news and information they receive. EchoStar's First Amendment challenge arises out of a 1998 lawsuit that TV networks filed demanding that the federal district court in Miami prohibit EchoStar from providing ABC, NBC, CBS and FOX programming to consumers unless the programming originates from the network affiliate located nearest to the consumer's home. The networks contend that if a consumer is predicted to receive a signal from their local network TV station using a massive roof-top antenna, then the consumer should not have the option of obtaining programming from the same network which originates in any other city, even when the distant network content is different from the local programming and may be preferred by the consumer. While every consumer in America has the right to purchase and read a newspaper printed outside the consumer's hometown, consumers are being prevented by an antiquated law from watching local TV news from other cities via satellite television. Source: Echostar Communications Related Links EchoStar Communications SpaceDaily Search SpaceDaily Subscribe To SpaceDaily Express FCC Suspends DirecTV Deal Review Washington - Mar 8, 2002 Late last week, regulators at the US Federal Communication Commission suspended a review of the proposed $26 billion satellite TV merger of EchoStar Communications and DirecTV pending further information from EchoStar.
|
|
The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2016 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. Privacy Statement All images and articles appearing on Space Media Network have been edited or digitally altered in some way. Any requests to remove copyright material will be acted upon in a timely and appropriate manner. Any attempt to extort money from Space Media Network will be ignored and reported to Australian Law Enforcement Agencies as a potential case of financial fraud involving the use of a telephonic carriage device or postal service. |