 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| . |  |
. |
 by Morris Jones for Spacewar.com Sydney, Australia (SPX) Oct 02, 2019
The recent test launch of a North Korean Submarine-Launched Ballistic Missile (SLBM) could be framed as just another event in a recent surge of new weapons test by the state. North Korea has conducted a flurry of missile launches in recent months, marking the debut of some new weapons that could possibly avoid Anti-Ballistic Missile (ABM) systems in nearby states. But all of these earlier tests were of land-based systems. This is not the first time that North Korea has tested a SLBM and they have been working on submarines to carry them for years. But one nagging question still confounds analysts. Why is North Korea bothering to even develop such a system? Submarines with ballistic missiles are probably the most potent weapons ever developed. They can prowl the world's vast oceans and hide undetected, staying below the surface for months at a time. They can protect themselves and elude pursuers. They can unleash enough firepower to destroy entire nations at short notice. With the end of the Cold War, the legendary cat-and-mouse games played by the world's major navies have somewhat subsided, but the potency of submarines remains evident. North Korea's submarines simply don't make the grade for such strategies. They are slow, have limited range, and are easy to detect. They would be under observation (and probably close pursuit) by nearby navies as soon as they deployed from their bases, which are hardly in secret locations. Destroying them would be easy. Thus, they are clearly not the best platform for carrying expensive arsenals of nuclear weapons, but even using conventional warheads on their missiles seems like a bad choice. Contrast this with mobile land-based systems, which can hide in hardened underground bunkers and roam to different locations, like a crude "find the pea under the cup" trick. From a purely strategic perspective, North Korea is better off investing in land-based systems than sea launches. So, why bother to develop these systems, which must surely consume a considerable amount of resources? One reason could be a crude attempt to simply diversify the nuclear delivery options, in case land-based systems become too easy to track and destroy. But there could also be an element of inter-service rivalry at work. Perhaps the Navy (a branch of the Korean People's Army) is simply jealous of the ground forces of the Army. Similar rivalries have affected the armed forces of other nations, and influenced the development and deployment of nuclear weapons in the USA. Dr Morris Jones is an Australian space analyst who has written for SpaceDaily.com since 1999. Email morrisjonesNOSPAMhotmail.com. Replace NOSPAM with @ to send email.
N.Korea doubts prospects for future summit with US Seoul (AFP) Sept 27, 2019 US aggression and an obsession with disarmament mean another summit between Washington and Pyongyang is looking doubtful, North Korea said on Friday, even as it praised US President Donald Trump as "bold" and "wise". Washington has "done nothing for the implementing the joint statement" from the first US-North Korea summit held in Singapore last year, Kim Kye Gwan, advisor to North Korea's foreign ministry, wrote in a statement carried in Pyongyang's official news wire KCNA. The official then sl ... read more
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
| The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2024 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. All articles labeled "by Staff Writers" include reports supplied to Space Media Network by industry news wires, PR agencies, corporate press officers and the like. Such articles are individually curated and edited by Space Media Network staff on the basis of the report's information value to our industry and professional readership. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Statement Our advertisers use various cookies and the like to deliver the best ad banner available at one time. All network advertising suppliers have GDPR policies (Legitimate Interest) that conform with EU regulations for data collection. By using our websites you consent to cookie based advertising. If you do not agree with this then you must stop using the websites from May 25, 2018. Privacy Statement. Additional information can be found here at About Us. |
del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Google
