by Aleida K. Higginson for AGU News
Washington DC (SPX) Feb 29, 2016
Models based on the Sun's polar magnetic fields performed best in simulating the solar cycle and predicting solar behavior. Solar activity level rises and falls every 11 years. The most recent maximum in solar activity level, the 24th since recording began in 1755, was the weakest in almost 100 years and peaked in early 2014.
Solar activity refers to dark regions on the surface of the Sun called sunspots, where the Sun's magnetic field has become tangled. They can produce sudden explosions of energy in the form of intense radiation and energetic particles.
Sometimes, these regions will even kick out a portion of the tangled magnetic field and send it hurdling into space in an event called a coronal mass ejection. When these bursts of radiation, particles, and magnetic field reach Earth, they cause geomagnetic storms, which can interfere with communication satellites and power grids on the ground. These events could also be harmful to astronauts traveling to Mars, exposing them to possibly deadly amounts of radiation.
For each solar cycle scientists publish their forecasts, using their own preferred methods, anticipating how large the peak of solar activity will be and when it will occur. Now that the peak of solar cycle 24 has passed, a new study by Pesnell compares all of the predictions to determine which forecasts were the most accurate.
The two most popular ways to model the solar cycle were (1) to use the historical record of the number of sunspots and (2) to couple the sunspot number to another measurement that varies with the solar cycle. Scientists who used the sunspot number alone argued that past trends can predict statistically what the next solar cycle will look like.
This method is particularly appealing because the historical record of sunspots goes back farther than any other space weather measurement. But it turns out that models using this number alone rarely made better predictions than just the average of previous solar maxima.
Scientists who coupled the sunspot number to another measurement predominantly chose either geomagnetic activity level or the strength of the magnetic fields at the Sun's poles.
For past solar cycles, models using geomagnetic activity level made more accurate predictions, but this accuracy may be due to the fact that solar polar magnetic field data were scarce or unreliable. This time, for solar cycle 24, the models using polar magnetic fields made the best predictions by far.
For solar cycle 25, slated to begin as early as 2020, the author predicts that scientists will need more information on the Sun's magnetic field to increase the accuracy of their models and points out that these predictions will be essential as our society's reliance on technology grows and we strive to become an interplanetary species. (Space Weather, doi:10.1002/2015SW001304, 2016)
Earth and Space Science at AGU
Solar Science News at SpaceDaily
|The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2016 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. Privacy Statement All images and articles appearing on Space Media Network have been edited or digitally altered in some way. Any requests to remove copyright material will be acted upon in a timely and appropriate manner. Any attempt to extort money from Space Media Network will be ignored and reported to Australian Law Enforcement Agencies as a potential case of financial fraud involving the use of a telephonic carriage device or postal service.|