Subscribe free to our newsletters via your
. 24/7 Space News .


Subscribe free to our newsletters via your




















NASA's Troubled Future

Since the end of Apollo, finding and promoting experienced managers at NASA has been a concern. It is an easy transition to move experienced managers from aeronautics to astronautics provided they have been involved in major programs on which to learn the program management trade.
by Donald A. Beattie
Washington DC (SPX) Aug 30, 2007
Some in the aerospace community believe that unless NASA sends astronauts back to the Moon and conducts extensive exploration, it is in danger of disappearing as a government agency. What is the basis for this fear? The last time astronauts began a mission to the Moon was December 7, 1972. Until the Clementine lunar mission in 1994, a leftover spacecraft from a DOD program, robotic exploration of the Moon ended in 1968 with Surveyor 7.

Yet NASA has survived for these last thirty-five years by carrying out other important work called for in its charter. It hasn't always been pretty, there have been setbacks as well as triumphs, but it survived.

The real danger is that this fear may become a self-fulfilling prophecy. Actions taken by the current administration and NASA management have set NASA on a narrow path that will constrain future programs. In order to achieve the near-term goal of the President's Vision, returning astronauts to the Moon by 2020, NASA has begun to mortgage its future.

The most debilitating result of concentrating on sending astronauts to the Moon has been the treatment of the first "A" in NASA - aeronautics. With a proud history of over ninety years of research and innovation that influenced the design and operation of essentially all aircraft now flying, NASA has been forced to retreat from its leadership role. NACA, and then NASA, pioneered research in propulsion, structures, materials, flight control systems, and more recently contributed in a critical arena, improving air traffic control.

NASA centers at Langley, Lewis, Ames, and Edwards, were the bedrock upon which NASA was founded. They have witnessed a steady deterioration in their ability to conduct cutting-edge research despite two, Glenn and Dryden, having new names. The unique industry- government partnership that evolved over the years that made our civil aviation sector the envy of the world has become an afterthought.

Does anyone remember that many senior agency managers from Langley, Lewis, and Ames became the core of Apollo managers at the Manned Spacecraft Center in Houston and other locations? Since the end of Apollo, finding and promoting experienced managers at NASA has been a concern. It is an easy transition to move experienced managers from aeronautics to astronautics provided they have been involved in major programs on which to learn the program management trade. But, when needed in the future, the pool of such highly trained managers will be very small because of reductions in aeronautics research.

Global climate change, a more recent concern, is a research area in which NASA is a natural leader to develop the tools and expertise to better understand what is going on. NOAA and the USGS depend on NASA to provide the technology they need to perform their missions to measure and predict the effects of the changes taking place. However, resources in this area have also been reduced in order to support returning to the Moon. One of the results is that the Landsat program, currently providing degraded data from Landsats 5 and 7, will probably experience a period after 2010 when there will be no functioning satellites on orbit.

In describing how bad the overall Earth science situation is, the Space Science Board of the National Academies released a report in 2005 containing the following damming statement: "At NASA, the viability of Earth science and applications programs has been placed at substantial risk by a rapidly shrinking budget that no longer supports already approved missions and programs of high scientific and societal relevance." Over the next decade, the report recommended NASA fund 14 new Earth observation missions. Where will the funds be found to support this recommendation with NASA concentrating on returning to the Moon?

Another example is the change in emphasis for research to be conducted by the US on the International Space Station (ISS). Research originally envisioned on the ISS included a long list of experiments that would take advantage of the unique microgravity environment. Experimenters from universities, industry, and government laboratories signed up to participate. Expensive facilities were built to be carried to orbit in order to perform the experiments. NASA has decided to restrict experiments to those that will contribute to understanding the physiological effects of long- duration space flight.

Now, only the international partners will be able to take full advantage of the $100 billion dollar investment and conduct experiments in many areas, such as manufacturing new products. That assumes, of course, that there will be a means to increase the international crew on board the ISS to six or more, a capability that does not exist today. This is a inexcusable waste of the monies American taxpayers have invested in the ISS. The reason that NASA has reduced its ISS experimental horizons, lack of funds.

It would appear that the only way to return some semblance of order and stability to NASA's programs is for Congress to take the leadership role and balance NASA's research portfolio. But time is running out. Actions already taken at the Centers and with contractors will soon become irreversible and NASA's ability to maintain preeminence in traditional research areas will be lost. The decision to retire the shuttle in 2010 must be immediately reevaluated before the point of no return occurs. Perhaps NASA has already closed that door with the actions it has taken, but never say never. Shuttles are the only means to keep the ISS fully supplied and crewed until the CEV/CVL become operational, a very uncertain date.

Community
Email This Article
Comment On This Article

Related Links
Donald A Beattie
Space Analysis and Space OpEds



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


Russian Space Guru Opts For Evolution
Moscow (RIA Novosti) Aug 24, 2007
Russia's Federal Space Agency will go slow on its strategy for manned flights. At any rate, this is the implication made by its chief, Anatoly Perminov, at a news conference held at the MAKS-2007 air show on August 22. "Our main goal is to use the reliable old systems for manned flights," he said in a preamble to the subject of new spacecraft and deep space studies.







  • Mice Stressed In Simulated Weightlessness Show Organ Atrophy
  • Environmental Tectonics' NASTAR Center To Provide Space Training For Virgin Galactic
  • NASA Study Will Help Stop Stowaways To Mars
  • NASA debunks claims of drunken space flights

  • Phoenix Takes Flight
  • Surviving Desert Storm
  • HiRISE Confirms Existence of 'Pit Craters' On Mars
  • Threatening Conditions For Rovers In Giant Martian Dust Storm

  • ISRO Plans More Launches, INSAT-4CR In Good Health
  • India Lofts GEO Bird Using Powerful New Domestic Built Launcher
  • India launches communications satellite
  • SpaceX Dragon Spacecraft Receives Initial Approval From NASA Safety Review Panel

  • NASA Scientist Treks To Burning Man Festival
  • European Hot Spots And Fires Identified From Space
  • China Develops Beidou Satellite Monitoring System
  • DigitalGlobe Announces Launch Date For WorldView-1

  • Outbound To The Outerplanets At 7 AU
  • Charon: An Ice Machine In The Ultimate Deep Freeze
  • New Horizons Slips Into Electronic Slumber
  • Nap Before You Sleep For Your Cruise Into The Abyss Of Outer Sol

  • Shrinking Giants, Exploding Dwarves
  • Water Vapor Seen 'Raining Down' On Young Star System
  • Neutron Stars Warp Space-Time
  • XMM-Newton And Suzaku Help Pioneer Method For Probing Exotic Matter

  • Russia plans manned Moon mission by 2025
  • An Exploding Lunar Eclipse
  • SpaceDev To Build Lunar Lander Prototype
  • Drawing A Living On Lunar

  • Lockheed Martin Bids On Next Generation Global Positioning Satellite System
  • Boeing Bids On Next Generation Global Positioning Satellite System
  • Tracking The Elusive Shipping Container Out Beyond The Horizon
  • Russia Starts Serial Production Of New Navigation Systems

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2007 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement