. 24/7 Space News .
How Much Will Beijing Pay For The Olympics

The Chinese have already started making money. A year before the games, Chinese shops abound in Olympic souvenirs and goods with Olympic symbols. There are bright ads of the future games all around, even at the bottom of the Great Chinese Wall. The 2008 Olympic symbols have already reached Moscow.
by Vasily Zubkov
Moscow (RIA Novosti) May 28, 2007
The Chinese authorities are sparing no expense for the 2008 Olympic Games. They are eager to show the whole world China's impressive economic success, growing prosperity, openness and love of peace. The Chinese Olympics promises to be the most expensive sports event in human history.

In the past hundred years, the summer 2004 Olympics in Athens had the biggest price tag - seven billion Euros. Preparations for it dealt a serious blow at the Greek budget - it developed a 5.3% deficit, which exceeds by far the European Union's admissible threshold. Judging by all, the 2008 Olympic Games in Beijing can break this record.

Getting ready for the games, the Chinese carefully studied the Greek experience. The Greeks got into financial problems largely because they did not include in the budget a considerable part of expenditures on social needs and other indirect Olympic requirements. In order to avoid this, the Chinese and Beijing budgets were sensibly over-adjusted. But it is still unknown how much exactly the Chinese are going to spend on the games.

In official estimates, in the 2002-2007 period investment in the Olympic preparations should reach 141 billion Yuans (about $18 billion). But the closer the games, the more doubts there are about China's ability to keep within the announced budget. Quoting Beijing authorities some foreign sources report that China will have to spend 63 billion Yuans ($8 billion) on the construction of new underground lines and other transportation facilities, and another 40 billion Yuans ($5 billion) on the building of satellite cities.

The figure of 280 billion Yuans ($39 billion) looks more authentic but it absorbs only indirect spending on Olympic preparations. It does not cover the construction of sports facilities and development of a security system. Nor does it include the 67 billion Yuans ($8.5 billion) that the port of Qingdao (Tsingtao - Western postal name) was going to spend on the preparations for the Olympic regatta in the Yellow Sea.

Athens spent $2.4 billion on competitions, accommodation of athletes and guests and other events that were directly linked with competitions. Let's compare it with Chinese spending. Deputy Chairman of the Olympics-2008 Organizing Committee Wang Wei said that in March 2007, China spent two billion dollars on the project, half of which came from the International Olympic Committee. Preliminary estimates show that Beijing will spend on the Olympics many times more than Athens did.

At the same time, the money spent is already bringing benefits to China. Lavish Olympic injections have given a powerful impetus to the construction of housing and transport facilities; additional government contracts have encouraged the development of domestic high tech companies working in electronic instrument-making and machine-building.

Beijing's economy has been streamlined; the share of services has shot up, and the environmental situation in the Chinese capital has improved. In official figures, the Beijing economy owes a 2.07% addition to the annual growth rates to the Olympic projects. The programs already implemented are bringing more than one billion dollars a year to the municipal budget.

It is only natural that the state has funded the bulk of indirect Olympic spending, but private investors have also made a contribution. Some companies are sponsoring the Olympics, for example General Electric and Eastman Kodak. Others have invested in sports hoping for future dividends. Thus, the American Golden State Holding is building the main Olympic stadium in Beijing and simultaneously working on an electric power station and a water duct in one of the city's districts.

A company set up with the participation of local residents is building an all-purpose sports palace Wukesong (Five Pine Trees) in the west of Beijing. It will host a basketball tournament. After 2008 this centre will become private. Other Olympic facilities will also be used for trade and entertainment. For example, the Olympic water sports centre - the Water Cube - will become Beijing's biggest water leisure facility. The two thousand flats built for athletes will be sold.

It is striking that the thrifty Chinese are spending money on such an unusual scale. Their Olympic budget extends to projects in cities that will not host the Olympics. The steppe-located city of Hohhot will get a new airport worth $70 million and a fast highway linking it with Beijing. This is done to back up the capital airport in case of heavy rains during the games.

The Beijing Organizing Committee rejected my apprehensions about huge spending and an ability to recoup it. A high-ranking Chinese official said: "The main goal of the Olympic investment is to create an infrastructure that will serve the people of Beijing after 2008 as well. We will make the Olympic budget profitable. We are doing all we can for our games to be one of the best and they will bring us money."

The Chinese have already started making money. A year before the games, Chinese shops abound in Olympic souvenirs and goods with Olympic symbols. There are bright ads of the future games all around, even at the bottom of the Great Chinese Wall. The 2008 Olympic symbols have already reached Moscow.

Considering the profits that the Olympic Organizing Committee will make from selling the rights to television broadcasting of competitions, sponsor incomes, and money from ticket sales (worth almost one billion dollars), it is easy to believe that the Olympic Games in Beijing will not bring financial losses.

earlier related report
Analysis: China not changing for Olympics
by Shihoko Goto
Tokyo (UPI) May 25 - China's human rights record and its authoritarian regime are disturbing to many Americans, but calls for the United States to boycott the Beijing Olympics next summer in protest remain in the minority.

The UPI/Zogby poll of more than 5,000 Americans, weighted to make it representative of the country as a whole, found that even though more than 46 percent do not expect China to make any changes in its human rights policies as a result of hosting the Olympics, a resounding 78 percent of respondents said the United States should not boycott the summer games in protest.

Meanwhile, nearly 39 percent "strongly disagreed" with the idea that U.S. participation in the Beijing Olympics would validate Chinese government policies, while about 34 percent "somewhat disagreed" with the statement. Moreover, 33 percent said they were "somewhat favorable" towards the International Olympic Committee's decision to award the 2008 summer games to Beijing, with nearly 12 percent stating that they were "very favorable" about the outcome.

Such findings should be music to the ears of the Chinese authorities, who are stepping up efforts not only to build up their capital's infrastructure to host the games, but are also cleaning up the streets and air quality to meet international standards. Certainly, the Olympics are seen as an opportunity for Beijing to showcase itself as a global metropolis, and for the Chinese government to highlight its cultural accomplishments as much as its economic might.

Yet many international advocacy groups are rallying to increase pressure to get the Chinese authorities to respect human rights if they are to host the games. In fact, Amnesty International is concerned that the games are being used as an excuse for the government to purge dissidents from the capital.

"If the Chinese authorities and the International Olympic Committee are serious about the Olympics having a 'lasting legacy' for China, they should be concerned that the Games are being used as a pretext to entrench and extend forms of detention that have been on China's reform agenda for many years," said Catherine Baber, Amnesty's Asia-Pacific director.

Most advocacy groups broadly agree that while China is making steady progress in preparing to host the Olympics, there has been almost no change in the country's political climate, and some argue that the crackdown on government opposition has actually only intensified. A group of human rights organizations including the Federation for a Democratic China, which was founded by Chinese exiles after the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre to rally for political freedom in the country, wrote to IOC President Jacques Rogge last week calling for the committee to hold the Beijing Organizing Committee accountable for the lack of progress on human rights since 2001, when the city won the right to host the games.

Those calling for the independence of Tibet too are clamoring for foreign governments to challenge the Chinese authorities about their hold on the region, particularly as Beijing is limiting media access to Tibet both before and during the games.

"The opportunity that the Olympics bring to foreign journalists to interview individuals freely all over China has been denied in Tibet. Again the Tibetans have been betrayed with another promise broken in the full sight of the international community," argued Yael Weisz Rind, director of the London-based Free Tibet Campaign.

Public support for such campaigns appears to be on the rise. Of the 5,141 adults surveyed between May 16 and 18, Zogby found that 57 percent would "strongly oppose" the Chinese government suppressing demonstrations by human rights organizations during the Olympics, only 28 percent of respondents said they would "strongly support" advocacy groups using the games as an opportunity to make political statements against the country's human rights policies.

Still, most Americans are hesitant to vote with their wallets against China's human rights record. Questioned whether U.S. consumers should boycott products of U.S. corporations who sponsor the Beijing games, nearly three-quarters of those polled said that they were against boycotting products, with only 14 percent being for such a move.

The opinions expressed in this article are the author's and do not necessarily represent those of RIA Novosti.

Source: RIA Novosti

Source: United Press International

Email This Article

Related Links
2008 Olympic Games in Beijing
Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at SpaceWar.com
Learn about nuclear weapons doctrine and defense at SpaceWar.com



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


Is China A Military Threat Or Another Paper Tiger
Washington (UPI) May 24, 2007
How much of a threat is China's growing military to the security of the United States? China's investment in its military, from conventional weapons to cybersystems, along with its lack of openness regarding its intent, raises the possibility of a miscalculation that could spark a conflict with the United States, according to U.S. security policy experts.







  • Malaysian Astronauts Head To NASA For Training
  • Science Subcommittees Focus On Ensuring Health And Vitality Of NASA Workforce
  • Using History To Design The Future
  • Amid Turtles And Sharks, Astronauts Train For Lunar Mission

  • Opportunity Turns Up The Amps
  • Seeking Mars Survival Secrets
  • Breathtaking Views Of Deuteronilus Mensae On Mars
  • Mars Rover Spirit Unearths Surprise Evidence Of Wetter Past

  • Arianespace Maintains Launch Campaign Pace As Another Ariane 5 GEO Truck Takes Form
  • Microgravity Enterprises Launches Commercial Payload From New Mexico Spaceport
  • Energia Posts 220 Percent Rise In 2006 Net Profit
  • Russia And ESA Sign Contract For Four Soyuz Launches From Kourou

  • Tracking A Hot Spot In The Center Of The Biggest Ocean On Earth
  • MetOp-A Takes Up Service
  • General Dynamics Awarded Contract For NASA's Landsat Data Continuity Mission Study
  • ESA Presents The Sharpest Ever Satellite Map Of Earth

  • First Observation Of A Uranian Mutual Event
  • A Goofball Called Pluto
  • Continuing Our Jovian Journey
  • Rosetta And New Horizons Watch Jupiter In Joint Campaign

  • Gamma-Ray Bursts Active Longer Than Thought
  • Andromeda Way Will Make For A Nice Retirement Home For Our Sol
  • Baby Stars Hatching In Orion's Head
  • Johns Hopkins Team Finds Ring Of Dark Matter

  • No Plans To Join NASA Lunar Program Says Russian Space Agency
  • First China Mission To Moon To Launch By Year End
  • Oresme Crater Show Many Signs Of The Early Lunar Heavy Bombardment
  • US Rejected Russian Request For Joint Moon Program

  • GNSS And ESA Sign Cooperation Agreement For Satellite Navigation Technologies
  • Russian Satellite Navigation Devices On Sale This Year
  • Putin Makes Glonass Navigation System Free For Customers
  • EU Sees Public Money Saving Galileo From Drifting Off Course

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2006 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA PortalReports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additionalcopyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement