by Staff Writers
Washington DC (SPX) Nov 20, 2017
Is more always better? Researchers from Doshisha University in Kyoto, Japan, sought to find out if that was the case for measuring magnetic field strengths. Their paper, appearing this week in AIP Advances, from AIP Publishing, examines whether a double H-coil method or a single H-coil method is a more accurate way to measure magnetic field strength.
Single sheet testers (SSTs) measure the magnetic properties of electrical steel sheets, amorphous strips, and other metallic specimens. Although it sounds abstract, understanding the magnetic properties of different metals is vital to some of the numerical analysis that makes the electrical devices you use every day.
The magnetic field strength inside the exciting coil of an SST increases the farther away the coil is from the specimen. The researchers proposed that a double H-coil method would not only suppress the gradient of magnetic field inside the exciting coil, but also more accurately detect the magnetic field strength than the standard single-coil method.
To test this theory, the scientists measured the distribution of magnetic field strength by the single H-coil method using four separated H-coils simultaneously. Placing each of these four H-coils at different distances to the surface of the specimen "enables us to evaluate the influence of the position of the H-coil on the measurement accuracy of magnetic properties," wrote the authors. The researchers performed these experiments using both single-yoke type and double-yoke type SSTs designs.
"The major finding of our work is to be able to select the single H-coil method or the double H-coil method depending on the necessary data," said the paper's lead author Ryo Matsubara at Doshisha University. Matsubara and his team found that magnetic field strength and specific total loss (loss of power) increase linearly with the distance of the H-coil from the specimen surface.
"The double H-coil method is effective for the measurement of magnetization properties of [iron]-based amorphous strip as well as electrical steel sheets because it can estimate the surface magnetic field strength more accurately," said the authors in the paper.
Therefore, at times when data needs to be more accurate, such as using magnetic field strength in numerical analysis, the more accurate (if more complex) double H-coil method is the logical choice. But if the point of the experiment is to measure the specific total loss in order to determine the quality of the specimen, the single H-coil method can be used without loss of accuracy.
Boston MA (SPX) Nov 14, 2017
When it comes to concocting the complex mix of molecules that makes up fibers of natural silk, nature beats human engineering hands down. Despite efforts to synthesize the material, artificial varieties still cannot match the natural fiber's strength. But by starting with silk produced by silkworms, breaking it down chemically, and then reassembling it, engineers have found they can make a ... read more
American Institute of Physics
Space Technology News - Applications and Research
|The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2017 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. All articles labeled "by Staff Writers" include reports supplied to Space Media Network by industry news wires, PR agencies, corporate press officers and the like. Such articles are individually curated and edited by Space Media Network staff on the basis of the report's information value to our industry and professional readership. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. Privacy Statement|