. 24/7 Space News .
TRW Shareholders Block Northrop Grumman Hostile Bid

As one of the pioneers of the space program TRW is looking for a healthy premium for its individual shareholders in any takeover bid.
by Erick Trickey
Cleveland (AFP) May 3, 2002
TRW shareholders effectively blocked a 6.7 billion-dollar hostile takeover bid by defense giant Northrop Grumman Friday, in what TRW hailed as a "clear-cut victory" for its board.

"Shareholders did not believe (Northrop's) 53 dollar (per share) offer was an adequate price," TRW chairman Philip Odeen said at a press conference after a preliminary count of the votes.

Northrop chairman Kent Kresa said the California-based military contractor would review its "options" over the weekend, and issue a statement Monday.

Both companies' shares were down at the close of Friday's trading, with Northrop Grumman off 1.02 dollars at 122.38, and TRW 80 cents at 55 dollars.

The two companies have been locked in a bitter and highly public battle since Northrop launched its takeover bid in February in a move that would make it the second largest US military contractor behind Lockheed Martin Corp.

TRW, an aerospace and auto parts manufacturer coveted for its anti-missile laser defense technology, has been maneuvering to stay independent, or at worst, spin off parts of the company to prevent the Northrop acquisition.

Northrop could still make a higher offer, forcing another vote; the firm has already raised its offer once, from 6 to 6.7 billion dollars.

TRW's Odeen suggested Friday that TRW had not completely closed the door on Northrop, saying that officials from the two companies had a "very constructive" discussion late Thursday regarding arrangements for Northrop to review sensitive TRW financial information.

"If Northrop wishes to proceed, I am confident that we can reach a mutually acceptable agreement," he said.

The two firms have been unable to agree terms for Northrop to conduct due diligence of TRW's books, even though TRW has signed confidentiality agreements "with several parties" with a view to some type of deal that could involve a sale of parts of TRW or merger.

"The outcome of today's vote will not ultimately determine the fate of Northrop's bid for TRW," said UBS Warburg analyst David Strauss.

Still, Strauss expects Northrop stock to be under selling pressure as the range of options available to management narrows and the likelihood of a more expensive buy-out offer increases.

Strauss has a "hold" rating on Northrop stock, partly due to his concerns about the TRW offer.

Meanwhile, Northrop is looking for legal remedies to the roadblocks in its way.

The firm has filed suit in US federal court to overturn an Ohio statute that provides Ohio-based companies some protection against hostile takeover bids.

Ohio's Control Share Acquisition Act requires companies mounting hostile takeovers to get shareholder approval before buying more than 20 percent of the stock of an Ohio company.

That was the proposal TRW shareholders voted down in Friday's special shareholder meeting.

But legal experts suggest Northrop's legal strategy is a long shot.

"The law has been upheld by Ohio courts four times in the past 14 years, and the US Supreme Court upheld a similar Indiana law in 1987," noted Michael Ellis, a securities expert with Kahn, Kleinman, Yanowitz and Arnson, in Cleveland.

All rights reserved. � 2002 Agence France-Presse. Sections of the information displayed on this page (dispatches, photographs, logos) are protected by intellectual property rights owned by Agence France-Presse. As a consequence, you may not copy, reproduce, modify, transmit, publish, display or in any way commercially exploit any of the content of this section without the prior written consent of Agence France-Presse.

Related Links
TRW
Northrop Grumman
SpaceDaily
Search SpaceDaily
Subscribe To SpaceDaily Express

TRW Tries To Outflank Northrop As Hostile Bid Faces Test
New York (AFP) May 2, 2002
TRW was scrambling to shore up its defense against against a hostile offer by Northrop Grumman that would create a powerhouse military contractor ahead of a key test Friday at a shareholder meeting. In the latest volley, Cleveland, Ohio-based TRW said Wednesday that Northrop was using "misstatements" in an effort to sway TRW shareholders to keep its 6.7 billion-dollar offer alive.



Thanks for being here;
We need your help. The SpaceDaily news network continues to grow but revenues have never been harder to maintain.

With the rise of Ad Blockers, and Facebook - our traditional revenue sources via quality network advertising continues to decline. And unlike so many other news sites, we don't have a paywall - with those annoying usernames and passwords.

Our news coverage takes time and effort to publish 365 days a year.

If you find our news sites informative and useful then please consider becoming a regular supporter or for now make a one off contribution.
SpaceDaily Contributor
$5 Billed Once


credit card or paypal
SpaceDaily Monthly Supporter
$5 Billed Monthly


paypal only














The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2016 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. Privacy Statement All images and articles appearing on Space Media Network have been edited or digitally altered in some way. Any requests to remove copyright material will be acted upon in a timely and appropriate manner. Any attempt to extort money from Space Media Network will be ignored and reported to Australian Law Enforcement Agencies as a potential case of financial fraud involving the use of a telephonic carriage device or postal service.