| . | ![]() |
. |
Washington, DC Nov. 23, 1997 - Last week's incident involving Space Shuttle Atlantis and its cross-country ferry flight to California is being cited by critics of NASA's Shuttle privatization initiative as proof that the space agency is moving too quickly to consolidate manned space operations around a single contractor. But others are saying that too much is being made of the event.Workers apparently installed Atlantis atop its 747 carrier aircraft improperly, omitting a set of washers from bolts used to fasten the orbiter to the airplane. Critics contend - and officials of the United Space Alliance contractor firm confirmed - that under a worse case scenario the 100,000 pound Shuttle could have separated from the moorings atop the Boeing plane and fallen off. The incident would have destroyed a $2 billion spacecraft and possibly resulted in destruction of the carrier plane as well. USA is conducting an investigation into the event, which occurred at its Kennedy Space Center hangar before departing for Palmdale, California Nov. 11th. Atlantis is to undergo months of modifications and inspections while at its Boeing manufacturing plant. The most serious lingering consequence of the incident is that paperwork and certifications were signed off by senior workers testifying that all of the mounting hardware had in fact been installed. If certification documents are faked, the entire Space Shuttle certification process could be called into question. NASA and USA, a combine formed by Boeing and Lockheed Martin, signed a 1996 agreement to begin transfer of Shuttle operations from the federal government to the new contractor. The consolidation and privatization effort has lead to reduction in force at Kennedy Space Center, NASA's Shuttle launch base. Critics of the move have accused USA of damaging worker morale and lessening safety in its move to put space flight on a profit basis, charges that USA officials have denied. NASA has also pointed to improved launch times and smoother pre-launch preparations as indications that the privatization program was on track. NASA administrator Daniel Goldin is believed to be planning to move the privatization initiative to its next level in 1998 by considering a USA proposal to allow the return of commercial payloads to the Shuttle fleet. Commercial satellites and cargoes were banned from the Shuttle following the 1986 Challenger accident. Sources say USA believes that by allowing true commercial Shuttle operations, the fleet of winged craft could actually turn a profit. Others say the spaceships are too fragile and unreliable to accelerate its launching operations, and that such a move could lead to another space disaster. Providers of existing launch services using expendable rockets are also believed less that happy with the prospect of competing for business against the taxpayer-built and funded Shuttle fleet. Although it might make for interesting competition: the largest U.S. expendable rocket makers against which USA would compete the Shuttles are- Boeing and Lockheed Martin.
|
| |||||||||
| The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2016 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. Privacy Statement All images and articles appearing on Space Media Network have been edited or digitally altered in some way. Any requests to remove copyright material will be acted upon in a timely and appropriate manner. Any attempt to extort money from Space Media Network will be ignored and reported to Australian Law Enforcement Agencies as a potential case of financial fraud involving the use of a telephonic carriage device or postal service. |