. | . |
White Mars: Density Fows on Mars
Melbourne - Oct. 19, 2000 Mars has "normal" volcanoes, like on Earth (but bigger due to the lesser gravity and lack of plate tectonics), and these have "normal" pyroclastic flow deposits. However, I suggest that the chaos zones are evidence of collapse of CO2-saturated terrains. The scale of these collapses is tens to thousands of times the scale of volcanic density flows on Earth or Mars. Consequently, the length scale of the flows on Mars can be thousands of km, particularly since the debris load of the flow contains further CO2-bearing ices from Clathrate deposits in the regolith (Clathrates break down slowly at reduced pressure to water ice plus CO2 vapor).
By the time the northern plains are reached, mostly fine debris remains and this spreads out and settles down as a wide thin blanket, filling hollows, smoothing out the topography and mimicking the bed of an ocean (on Earth, the ocean floors are smooth not because of waves in the water smoothing out their beds, but because submarine density flows do the same job of filling hollows and smoothing out peaks). The recent Malin and Edgett flows are also more likely to be small scale seeps and outbursts of liquid CO2, than liquid water. Although most of the liquid CO2 has escaped from the regolith by now, some remains in cool sheltered spots, on poleward facing slopes. When our rovers explore these areas we should anticipate signs of chemical alteration by CO2, not by H2O!
Other channels on Mars In the earliest times of which we have evidence - the Noachian (over 4 billion years ago), there are rather different valleys. These form dendritic networks and are associated with drainage around major impact craters. Although they look superficially like branching river and stream systems on Earth, they lack the fine detail of sub-branches and have blunt tips to the valleys. In part this may be because they are so old and worn down, but the differences seem real. Fluids seem to have been widespread in the regolith at this time - at least in local areas, and to have been seeping out into the drainage network, sapping away (undermining) the valley heads. Over time, an initial small channel would grow into a branching network. We know very little about surface conditions during the Noachian. Certainly, major planetary bombardment was still continuing and the atmosphere of this Early Mars might either have been significantly warmed by the impacts, or cooled by dust and clouds in an "impact winter" scenario. It may be best to leave the Noachian aside for now - it clearly needs much more research, and it is easier to work back in time gradually. Let's work on understanding the middle age of Mars, before we go back to its earliest times. Another example often proposed as evidence for the steady flow of rivers on Mars are the sinuous valleys of Nanedi and Nirgal Valles. On Earth, sinuous valleys equate with meandering rivers, so perhaps the same is true for Mars? Unfortunately this analogy doesn't hold water. On the seabeds of Earth are numerous meandering channels formed by subsea density flows (submarine turbidity currents, or turbidites). These are formed not by steady flow of fluid but by repeated short bursts of density flows down the meandering channels. Although they look identical to subaerial channels formed by sluggish rivers on Earth, they were formed on the modern seabed, many kilometres down, and are still active today. Unfortunately for both the water-on-Mars adherents, and for my own model, the gross morphology of channels is not clearly diagnostic as to the type of fluid that formed them. For all of the examples discussed, any process chosen from subaerial flows of water, volcanic outbursts, submarine turbidites, or CO2 vapour-supported flows is equally capable of producing the evidence we see. As scientists, we must examine the other evidence and decide which process is most likely. If we see volcanic cones in the source areas, then we would invoke pyroclastic flows. If we see that everything is taking place within an ocean, then we would assume turbidites. On Mars, we see neither of these. There aren't any particular volcanic features in the chaos zones. The evidence for a northern ocean on Mars is already weak and certainly doesn't permit it to extend this far into the higher ground source areas of the flows. Sometimes channels are found on the flanks of volcanoes, but this association seems to be telling us that volcanic-sourced volatiles are forming the fluids in the flows, secondary to the eruptions that built the volcanoes. The decision about whether liquid water or CO2 vapour is the active fluid has to rely on the other evidence we have from Mars. We know that modern Mars is cold and dry. We know that we have difficulty explaining much of the surface evidence of Mars if we assume it was previously warm and wet. We observe, interestingly, that a CO2 -based explanation of the channel features on Mars solves all of the existing paradoxes and actually helps explain a lot of the minor niggling details about Mars that don't quite add up. If we accept the CO2 -based model, then there is no carbonate on Mars because there never was a "warm and wet" episode. No water means no aqueous chemistry so no carbonates (and no surface life). The Faint Young Sun Paradox is now an integral part of this model. Early Mars was even colder and drier than it is today, with less than 1 millibar of atmospheric pressure. The volumetric problem with the outburst "floods" is easily solved. When liquid CO2 explodes from underground, it expands by hundreds to thousands of times, so the spaces between the grains can easily hold enough CO2 to transport the entire debris load all the way to the northern plains. The result of this objective analysis is a strong suspicion about the standard model of Mars, and the need to do more work on White Mars models to test how well they fit the data, and what predictive power they have about Mars. This may be in terms of surface mineralogy, details of channel morphology, or the chemistry of the surface and regolith. Related Links SpaceDaily Search SpaceDaily Subscribe To SpaceDaily Express
|
|
The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2016 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. Privacy Statement All images and articles appearing on Space Media Network have been edited or digitally altered in some way. Any requests to remove copyright material will be acted upon in a timely and appropriate manner. Any attempt to extort money from Space Media Network will be ignored and reported to Australian Law Enforcement Agencies as a potential case of financial fraud involving the use of a telephonic carriage device or postal service. |