. 24/7 Space News .
US and Russia To Talk Nukes Despite Only "Virtual" Cuts
Huron King Underground Test - Crater 1980 20kt
Moscow Backs Washington On Moratorium For Nuclear Tests
Moscow, Jan 9 (AFP) - Russia Wednesday welcomed the US decision to continue the international moratorium on nuclear arms testing, ITAR-TASS news agency reported. Russian foreign ministry spokesman Alexander Iakovenko said the moratorium was "particularly important as Washington continues to obstinately refuse to ratify the agreement on the complete ban of nuclear tests", a reference to the 1996 Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT).

A spokesman for the White House confirmed Tuesday that US President George W. Bush "continued to be in favour of the moratorium" on nuclear arms testing. The statement came after US press reports suggested underground nuclear testing would begin again, despite the current government stance against it.

Former US president George Bush, the father of the current US leader, decided to impose the moratorium in 1992. The world's five heavyweight nuclear powers -- Russia, the United States, France, China and Britain -- signed the CTBT, however the parliaments of China and the United States have yet to ratify the treaty.

The Russian foreign ministry spokesman said the importance of non-proliferation and disarmament agreements had increased since the "erroneous decision by the United States to pull out of the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty" of 1972.

Bush said last month that the United States would pull out of the ABM treaty in six months time. Discussions on the reduction of strategic arms between the United States and Russia are due to take place later this month.

  • Photo source above - FAS US Test Page
  • by Jean-Michel Stoullig
    Moscow (AFP) Jan 10, 2002
    Arms reduction talks between Russia and the United States are to take place in Washington on January 15-16, the US ambassador in Moscow said on Thursday.

    The main thrust of the talks, the first since the United States decided to abandon the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile treaty forged with the Soviet Union, was laid out by Russian Defense Minister Sergei Ivanov in Brussels in mid-December.

    Russian officials said the talks were likely to tackle the scale of reductions, timing, the kind of weapons under scrutiny and how best to regulate the whole process.

    President Vladimir Putin has maintained that Russia will reduce its number of nuclear warheads to around 1,500 in spite of Washington's decision to abandon the ABM treaty.

    In November last year US President George W Bush indicated the United States was prepared to cut its warhead numbers.

    On Wednesday, Washington said it wanted to keep some of those warheads in reserve.

    Russia is keen that parameters for the reduction of strategic arsenals be included in a new treaty between the two countries, something the United States has appeared to oppose.

    However, some of the US nuclear weapons President George W. Bush promised his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin would be dismantled, will in fact be held in reserve and not destroyed, the White House said Wednesday.

    "Some will be removed from operations status and earmarked for destruction, others will be placed in retirement status for eventual destruction and still others will be maintained in a non-deployment status as a hedge against unforeseen technical international events," said White House spokesman Ari Fleischer.

    In November, Bush told Putin the United States would reduce its nuclear arsenal from about 6,000 warheads to between 1,700 and 2,200 over the next 10 years. The Russians, who plan parallel reductions, want the cuts set out in formal treaties with enforcement mechanisms.

    But in outlining a new nuclear strategy Wednesday, Assistant Secretary of Defense JD Crouch said the administration had not yet determined how many of the nuclear warheads slated for decommissioning under Bush's plan would be destroyed, and how many would be stored and available for redeployment.

    Crouch said an as yet undetermined number of the warheads will remain in the active stockpile after being removed from launchers.

    This "responsive capability" would give the Pentagon the ability to beef up the deployed force "in a way where over weeks, months and even years that we could respond to changes," he said,

    "At this point, no decisions have been made exactly on the character of that responsive force. And, as I said, there will be ongoing assessments on that and that number itself will probably change over time," he said.

    The administration has said it will eliminate its 50 Peacekeeper intercontinental ballistic missiles and convert four Trident ballistic missile submarines into platforms for cruise missiles. It also intends to adhere to START I counting rules.

    But Crouch indicated that decisions on how and even whether to bring down the arsenal below 6,000 warheads to the 2,200 to 1,700 range will be made and reviewed at regular intervals.

    As an additional hedge, the administration will refurbish its nuclear weapons production infrastructure and take steps to accelerate US readiness to conduct nuclear tests.

    "At this point there are no recommendations in the report about developing new nuclear weapons," Crouch said.

    "Now, we are trying to look at a number of initiatives. One would be to modify an existing weapon to give it greater capability against hard targets and deeply buried targets. And we're also looking at non-nuclear ways that we might be able to deal with those problems," he said.

    The new strategy came under fire from arms control advocates.

    Daryl Kimball, executive director of the Washington-based Arms Control Association, told The Washington Post: "If the reduced nuclear weapons are kept intact and available for redeployment, it makes a mockery of the reductions."

    Joseph Cirincione, another non-proliferation expert, said the new policy "will encourage Russians to stockpile as well, which is very dangerous."

    "This is a failed review," said Cirincione of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, a Washington think-tank.

    Disarmament advocates are also worried that the United States could resume nuclear tests, noting that in 2000 the Senate threw out the treaty banning such tests, the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty.

    Although Fleischer insisted the Bush administration for the time being would stick to a non-testing policy, he did not rule out the possibility of future tests.

    "The president has said that he will continue to adhere to the no testing policy. That could change in the future," he said.

    "We never rule out the possible need to test to make certain that the stockpile, particularly as it is reduced, is reliable and safe."

    Bush said Tuesday he wanted to maintain the moratorium on testing announced by his father, then-president George Bush, in 1992.

    Moscow backs Washington on moratorium for nuclear tests

    All rights reserved. � 2002 Agence France-Presse. Sections of the information displayed on this page (dispatches, photographs, logos) are protected by intellectual property rights owned by Agence France-Presse. As a consequence, you may not copy, reproduce, modify, transmit, publish, display or in any way commercially exploit any of the content of this section without the prior written consent of Agence France-Presse.

    Related Links
    Search SpaceDaily
    Subscribe To SpaceDaily Express

    India: War May Be On The Horizon
    New Delhi (AFP) Jan 11, 2002
    India's army chief Friday warned Pakistan against any nuclear strike, vowing maximum retaliation against any such move by Islamabad. "The perpetrator of that particular outrage shall be punished, shall be punished so severely that the continuation of any form of fray will be doubtful," General S. Padmanabhan told reporters. "We are ready for a second strike," he said. "Take it from me that we have enough." He noted that Pakistan had avoided following India which has pledged not to be the first to launch a nuclear strike.

    Powell Says US And Russia Very Close To New Nuclear Deal
    Moscow (AFP) Dec 10, 2001
    US Secretary of State Colin Powell said Monday that Washington and Moscow were very close to agreeing the levels of a new nuclear arms cut and that a formal deal could be signed before the middle of 2002.

    Thanks for being here;
    We need your help. The SpaceDaily news network continues to grow but revenues have never been harder to maintain.

    With the rise of Ad Blockers, and Facebook - our traditional revenue sources via quality network advertising continues to decline. And unlike so many other news sites, we don't have a paywall - with those annoying usernames and passwords.

    Our news coverage takes time and effort to publish 365 days a year.

    If you find our news sites informative and useful then please consider becoming a regular supporter or for now make a one off contribution.
    SpaceDaily Contributor
    $5 Billed Once

    credit card or paypal
    SpaceDaily Monthly Supporter
    $5 Billed Monthly

    paypal only

    The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2016 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. Privacy Statement All images and articles appearing on Space Media Network have been edited or digitally altered in some way. Any requests to remove copyright material will be acted upon in a timely and appropriate manner. Any attempt to extort money from Space Media Network will be ignored and reported to Australian Law Enforcement Agencies as a potential case of financial fraud involving the use of a telephonic carriage device or postal service.