. 24/7 Space News .
Beagle 2 Mars Lander Doomed From The Start

Beagle 2 after separation from Mars Express.
London (AFP) May 23, 2004
Severe organisational failures lie behind the loss of Beagle 2, the UK-lead space probe to Mars which vanished shortly before it landed on the Red Planet late last year, an official inquiry reported Monday.

Investigators were not able to place the blame on a single failure or shortcoming, an official told a press conference in London.

However such were the worries about the mission ahead of its launch that one leading member of the European Space Agency (ESA) said that he had wondered whether it might have been better cancelled.

Meanwhile the British scientist who masterminded the tiny probe, built with the goal of searching for signs of life on Mars, said that a Martian dust storm was the most likely reason behind its presumed destruction.

Professor Colin Pillinger told the press conference that these unusual atmospheric conditions meant Beagle's landing equipment failed to operate as planned.

The dust storms heated the Martian atmosphere, making it thinner, Pillinger explained.

"It was thinner than anticipated. If the atmosphere is thinner, everything is triggered later," he said, meaning that the parachutes and airbags meant to break Beagle's fall would have been deployed too late or not at all.

The miniature laboratory had been due to land on Mars on December 25 last year before flipping open like a pocket watch and beginning its work, but it disappeared without trace.

In contrast, a pair of US probes sent to Mars around the same time landed perfectly and have been sending back streams of data ever since.

Professor David Southwood, director of space science at ESA, said the inquiry had found that "no single event led to failure and no single individual made a bad decision".

"However, failure was institutional. We were working in a system which wasn't right, where the organisational structures weren't right and people didn't have the right level of empowerment, authority or resource," he told the press conference.

When he started his job in the summer if 2001, he examined the Beagle 2 project and initially decided that it should not take place at all.

"By the autumn I had accepted that Beagle was going to go," he said.

"Maybe I should never have accepted that. But frankly I would have had to have been a different person to me to take that final decision."

Although the inquiry's findings were released on Monday, the full report has been kept confidential, both to protect sensitive commercial interests and ensure no one was afraid to come forward with evidence.

One of the report's key recommendations was that future missions should see better integration between the orbiter craft and lander.

Beagle II was "added on" to the Mars Express Orbiter that carried it to Mars and treated as an instrument to be deployed rather than part of the whole spacecraft.

Full funding should also be committed at the start of a project, as against Pillinger's initial unsuccessful attempt to win commercial sponsorship for Beagle 2, the report said.

Beagle 2's budget is secret, but is unofficially estimated at around 30 to 50 million pounds (43-71 million euros, 54-89 million dollars), about a 10th of the budgeted cost of each of the two US rovers.

Despite the failure, Pillinger stressed that he had no regrets.

"We gave Beagle the very best shot we could within the constraints that were placed upon us," he said.

"We were right to have a go."

All rights reserved. � 2004 Agence France-Presse. Sections of the information displayed on this page (dispatches, photographs, logos) are protected by intellectual property rights owned by Agence France-Presse. As a consequence, you may not copy, reproduce, modify, transmit, publish, display or in any way commercially exploit any of the content of this section without the prior written consent of Agence France-Presse.

Related Links
Beagle 2
Search SpaceDaily
Subscribe To SpaceDaily Express

An Interview With Colin Pillinger
Moffett Field (SPX) May 04, 2004
From 200 million miles away on Mars, the European Beagle 2 lander was intended to send back a faint 5-watt signal. To acquire that miniscule signal could be compared to picking up a cellphone call if broadcast from Mars to Earth. That phone call was intended to as a Christmas greeting to scientists listening in after Beagle 2's expected December 25th touchdown.

Beagle 2: A Fortunate Failure
Honolulu - Jan 13, 2004
Everyone interested in Mars exploration should now take a few minutes off from looking at those fine photos of Gusev Lava Flow sent back by the Spirit rover. It is time to fall on our knees, face toward Memphis and give thanks to Elvis that the British Mars lander Beagle 2 has failed. I can't think of any possible event more potentially disastrous for the future of unmanned planetary exploration than the success of this particular mission writes Jeffrey F. Bell.

Thanks for being here;
We need your help. The SpaceDaily news network continues to grow but revenues have never been harder to maintain.

With the rise of Ad Blockers, and Facebook - our traditional revenue sources via quality network advertising continues to decline. And unlike so many other news sites, we don't have a paywall - with those annoying usernames and passwords.

Our news coverage takes time and effort to publish 365 days a year.

If you find our news sites informative and useful then please consider becoming a regular supporter or for now make a one off contribution.
SpaceDaily Contributor
$5 Billed Once

credit card or paypal
SpaceDaily Monthly Supporter
$5 Billed Monthly

paypal only

The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2016 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. Privacy Statement All images and articles appearing on Space Media Network have been edited or digitally altered in some way. Any requests to remove copyright material will be acted upon in a timely and appropriate manner. Any attempt to extort money from Space Media Network will be ignored and reported to Australian Law Enforcement Agencies as a potential case of financial fraud involving the use of a telephonic carriage device or postal service.