Subscribe free to our newsletters via your
. 24/7 Space News .




OPINION SPACE
What Ever Happened To Reusable Launch Vehicles
by Launchspace Staff
Bethesda MD (SPX) Feb 04, 2009


SpaceX has announced that Falcon stages may be retrieved and partially reused, but that has yet to happen.

The idea of reusing stages or all of a space launch vehicle has been around since before Buck Rogers first appeared in 1928. In fact, Jules Verne wrote about such a vehicle in 1865, when he published "From the Earth to the Moon."

Verne was one of the first science fiction authors, but he would be surprised to learn that we have only been able to build a partially reusable vehicle, the Space Shuttle. Why are we still struggling to create such a machine?

First, let's distinguish a space launcher from a suborbital vehicle. Space launchers are capable of achieving at least orbital flight about the Earth. Suborbital vehicles are able only to fly vertically to heights that exceed the sensible atmosphere, but they lack the speed to achieve orbit.

Thus, the several tourism vehicles that are being developed, such as that being built by Virgin Galactic, cannot achieve orbit. All of the world's current space launch vehicles, except the Shuttle, are completely expendable. In other words, none of the hardware is used more then once. Even the Shuttle is only partially reused.

As you might expect, this is an expensive way to get to orbit. Imagine if you could only drive your car to work once and then discard it. Every trip that you tool would require a new car. In stead of costing a few dollars each time you went to work, it would cost thousands.

The mere fact that a car is reusable makes each trip very inexpensive. So, why does the space program have to pay tens to hundreds of millions of dollars for each launch?

The simple truth is that we do not know how to make reusables and we cannot make a good business case for them. Many have tried, but all have failed. Most recently NASA spent over one billion dollars trying to build a scaled down technology demonstrator, the X-33.

This was to be the forerunner for a single-stage-to-orbit vehicle, VentureStar. In 2000, after several years of trying to build the demonstrator, the program was shut down. The needed technology was simply not ready.

Walter Kistler started a reusable launch vehicle company around 1993 to pursue a two-stage-to-orbit, fully reusable vehicle. Kistler Aerospace raised over $500 million in private funds and proceeded to construct the first prototype, the K-1.

But, the vehicle got too expensive and the perceived market disappeared when Iridium filed for bankruptcy at the turn of the century. Kistler Aerospace was liquidated before completing that first vehicle.

Here we are. It is 2009 and there are no fully reusable space launchers. The Shuttle is scheduled to be retired next year, and be replaced with an expendable Ares I. There are no near-term prospects for a truly reusable launch vehicle.

SpaceX has announced that Falcon stages may be retrieved and partially reused, but that has yet to happen. To summarize, we are spending an average of roughly $70 million per launch, when we could be spending about one-tenth of this amount, if only we had reusables. Why?

The answer has several parts. There is not enough launch vehicle demand to justify the multi-billion-dollar expense of developing a true reusable. In order to cut the per-launch cost by a factor of 10, there would have to be an extremely high launch frequency.

Today, the world wide annual launch rate is about 68. This will have to increase by an order of magnitude or more to make the reusable financially viable. To further complicate the picture, reusables are limited to low orbits about the Earth. The requirement of returning the vehicle limits the distance from Earth because the propellant needed to return is very limited.

The Shuttle is limited and cannot go beyond the International Space Station. This eliminates one of the most important launch customers, the geostationary satellite operators.

Finally, there are several challenging technology issues that must be resolved before we can build a reliable, high-performing reusable vehicle. Sadly, is does not appear that reusables are in our near-term future.

.


Related Links
Launchspace
Space Analysis and Space OpEds






Comment on this article via your Facebook, Yahoo, AOL, Hotmail login.

Share this article via these popular social media networks
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit GoogleGoogle








OPINION SPACE
The Griffin Space Fantasy
Honolulu HI (SPX) May 05, 2007
The March 14 2007 issue of Aviation Week contained an article by NASA Administrator Mike Griffin which apparently is the most detailed statement yet of his long-range plans. In this article and related press interviews, Griffin makes a case that NASA is not really as underfunded as many critics say, and that the US can afford three major space projects on the scale of Project Apollo over the next 50 years without major budget increases. ... read more


OPINION SPACE
NASA Selects Teams For Moon Impact Observation Campaign

USRA Selects Awardees For LCROSS Observation Campaign

NASA Goddard To Investigate The Stormy Moon

Exploring The Eighth Continent

OPINION SPACE
Spirit Resumes Driving

NASA And Google Launch Virtual Exploration Of Mars

Mars Rover Team Diagnosing Unexpected Behavior

NASA-Derived Technology Captures Unique Inaugural Image

OPINION SPACE
NASA Ames Becomes Home To Newly Launched Singularity University

Western powers worried about Iran satellite technology

Planetary Society Reaches Out To Congress On NASA Funding

Successful Test In Development Of NASA's New Crew Rocket

OPINION SPACE
China plans own satellite navigation system by 2015: state media

Fengyun-3A Weather Satellite Begins Weather Monitoring

Shenzhou-7 Monitor Satellite Finishes Mission After 100 Days In Space

China Launches Third Fengyun-2 Series Weather Satellite

OPINION SPACE
Russia To Use Two Launch Pads At Baikonur For ISS Missions

Spacehab To Support Pre-Launch Preparations For Russian Module

Kogod Students Pioneer Branding Potential Of International Space Station

Russia Tests Phone Home To Santa Network

OPINION SPACE
Arianespace To Launch Hispasat 1E

Arianespace Orders 35 Ariane 5 ECA Launchers From Astrium

Arianespace seals four-billion-euro rocket deal

New Ariane 5 Arrives In French Guiana

OPINION SPACE
COROT Discovers Smallest Exoplanet Yet

Worlds apart: Satellite spots smallest 'exoplanet' ever

Spitzer Watches Wild Weather On A Star-Skimming Planet

Astronomers Get A Sizzling Weather Report From A Distant Planet

OPINION SPACE
State-Of-The-Art Grating For Gaia

SBIRS Payload Operationally Accepted

Eutelsat Statement On The W2M Satellite

Japan's Fujitsu scraps HDD head business




The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2014 - Space Media Network. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. Privacy Statement