. 24/7 Space News .




.
DRAGON SPACE
That's No Lab, It's a Space Station
by Morris Jones
Sydney, Australia (SPX) Jun 22, 2012

File image.

Tiangong 1 is described by its Chinese builders as a "space laboratory". This term is has been widely adopted by journalists and space analysts. It's probably not inaccurate to call the Tiangong 1 spacecraft, which has received its first crew of astronauts, a laboratory, for scientific experiments are certainly being conducted there. But does this term fully describe Tiangong 1?

Prior to the arrival of three astronauts on board the Shenzhou 9 spacecraft, it was difficult to say a lot about what was inside Tiangong. We had some basic information, some photographs and some rather dubious graphical illustrations to serve as guides.

We also had notice that crewed expeditions to the module would be few and would be short. This all served to reinforce the notion that Tiangong 1 could be thought of as a laboratory in space, and little else.

It was easy to invoke comparisons with Europe's "Spacelab" module, a cylindrical habitat that was sometimes flown in the payload bay of the US Space Shuttle.

Spacelab contained racks of laboratory equipment, space for astronauts in a central corridor, some basic atmospheric and thermal control systems, and little else. Astronauts worked aboard the module but did not really live there.

The necessities of life in space were still provided by facilities in the crew cabin of the Space Shuttle, which was connected to Spacelab by a tunnel. It could also not operate or fly independently of the Shuttle. Spacelab was certainly a laboratory, but it could not be called a space station.

Tiangong 1 would host crews delivered aboard Shenzhou spacecraft, which themselves carry all the basic essentials for life in space. It was theorized by this writer (and other analysts) that Tiangong would not duplicate all of the facilities found on board Shenzhou. This was partially due to the small volume of the Tiangong spacecraft and the proximity of Shenzhou. Some things did seem redundant, especially on short missions.

Gradually, we have learned more about the capabilities of Tiangong. Our first real images of its interior, presented before the first crew was launched, showed a module that looked far more inviting than the Spacelab of old.

The interior was very roomy and also featured two sleeping berths. Tiangong was starting to look a lot nicer to occupy. Images of the first crew to work on Tiangong have gradually revealed more about its features, and Chinese authorities have also disclosed more information. Tiangong also features toilet facilities, an independent communications system for the astronauts, exercise gear and provisions for the crew.

It seems more possible for astronauts to live aboard Tiangong without depending on their Shenzhou carrier spacecraft. This raises an interesting question. Is it really accurate to call Tiangong a space station?

Tiangong is small. Its logistical capabilities are also limited. It cannot support large crews. It will only host two brief expeditions. The work performed aboard Tiangong will be less than on many short-duration Shuttle missions. Yes, it's not a major home in space. But it still seems to qualify as a true space station.

Astronauts can live and work aboard Tiangong with facilities that are different (and in some cases more advanced) than those found aboard most other spacecraft, except for those that also qualify as space stations. It cannot return to Earth intact and does not support astronauts during launch. It also receives dockings from other spacecraft.

China seems to be reserving the term "space station" for the large, modular space station it plans to build around 2020. Calling Tiangong 1 a laboratory distinguishes this module from the next-generation space base in the future.

But Tiangong 1 still seems worthy of being called a small space station. Even if China persists with the Laboratory designator, analysts can still recognize its true status.

Dr Morris Jones is an Australian space analyst and writer. Email morrisjonesNOSPAMhotmail.com. Replace NOSPAM with @ to send email.

Related Links
China National Space Administration
The Chinese Space Program - News, Policy and Technology
China News from SinoDaily.com




.
.
Get Our Free Newsletters Via Email
...
Buy Advertising Editorial Enquiries




Man Versus Machine on Shenzhou
Sydney, Australia (SPX) Jun 24, 2012 - The first attempt at a manual docking by a Chinese spacecraft has been a success, but it still raises issues to be explored. The Shenzhou 9 spacecraft successfully undocked from the Tiangong 1 space laboratory and withdrew a few hundred metres under automatic control.

After a short solo flight, Shenzhou 9 was slowly piloted towards Tiangong by astronaut Liu Wang. The docking was broadcast live on China Central Television, suggesting that China was fairly confident of a successful outcome.

China can be justifiably proud of this achievement. The mission of Shenzhou 9 has steadily generated a growing list of major achievements, but this has been the most complex.

Manual docking is probably the most risky and dangerous feat that can be attempted in human spaceflight, short of landing a spacecraft on a runway or the surface of an alien world. China got it right on the first attempt, with little evidence of trouble.

Yes, this was a successful outcome, but it still wasn't perfect. It's true that automatic docking will always have the potential to outperform astronauts in some tasks. The final approach wasn't as steady and true as it could have been, even though it was eventually corrected.

This suggests that the manual controls aren't quite as responsive as they should be. Or perhaps Liu wasn't quite at his best. Soon after the docking, this author also watched as Liu Yang, China's first woman astronaut, prodded Liu Wang on the thigh to draw his attention to a control panel. Liu Wang then reached out with a stick to push a button.

The nature of the display and the button were not visible on television, but it seems that Liu Wang wasn't quite keeping pace with events at a critical stage in the mission. This raises another question. Is Liu Wang suffering mildly from space sickness, and has this affected his performance?

China's official state media will probably give no clues. But the manual docking has highlighted the rivalry between man and machines in space. Automatic docking remains the preferred choice for the Chinese space program, with manual docking as a backup option when automatic systems fail.

There will be a need to practice more manual dockings in the future, but they will probably remain of secondary importance to automatic systems. So far, machines are winning this contest.

Dr Morris Jones is an Australian space analyst and writer. Email morrisjonesNOSPAMhotmail.com. Replace NOSPAM with @ to send email.



.

. Comment on this article via your Facebook, Yahoo, AOL, Hotmail login.

Share this article via these popular social media networks
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit GoogleGoogle



DRAGON SPACE
Designer elaborates on challenges facing Shenzhou-9 mission
Beijing (XNA) Jun 22, 2012
In an interview, the general designer of the Tracking, Telemetry, Command and Communication System of the China Manned Space Engineering Qian Weiping said that, if we say the core mission of the Shenzhou-9 is to realize the rendezvous and docking and withdraw, then the core of the core task is the fight management and control, and everyone is paying close attention to the "flight control." ... read more


DRAGON SPACE
Researchers Estimate Ice Content of Crater at Moon's South Pole

Researchers find evidence of ice content at the moon's south pole

Nanoparticles found in moon glass bubbles explain weird lunar soil behaviour

UA Lunar-Mining Team Wins National Contest

DRAGON SPACE
Extensive Water in Mars Interior

Orbiter Out of Precautionary 'Safe Mode'

Researchers calculate size of particles in Martian clouds of CO2 snow

ESA tests self-steering rover in 'Mars' desert

DRAGON SPACE
Complex Challenges Solved In Tech Meetings For Commercial Crew Program

Boeing Completes Key Reviews of Space Launch System

NASA technology-sharing portal announced

Two NASA Visualizations Selected for Computers Graphics Showcase

DRAGON SPACE
That's No Lab, It's a Space Station

Man Versus Machine on Shenzhou

Designer elaborates on challenges facing Shenzhou-9 mission

Above and below, Chinese science soars

DRAGON SPACE
New Space Station Crew Confirmed

Spacewalk to work on ISS scheduled

Did You Say 1.2 Billion Particles Per Month?

Varied Views from the ISS

DRAGON SPACE
USAF officials announce milestone Atlas V launch

EVE Underflight Calibration Sounding Rocket Launch

ILS and AsiaSat Announce a New Contract for an ILS Proton Launch

A milestone in launcher preparations for Arianespace's fourth Ariane 5 flight of 2012

DRAGON SPACE
Where Are The Metal Worlds And Is The Answer Blowing In The Wind

Metal-poor stars are rich with small planets

Astronomers spy 2 planets in tight quarters as they orbit a distant star

Astronomers with NASA's Kepler Mission find 'puzzling pair of planets'

DRAGON SPACE
IT security problems shift as data moves to 'cloud'

ISS to Build Up Meteorite Defenses

Smartphones put writing on the wall for paid texts

NRL Scientists Propose Mitigation Concept of LEO Debris


Memory Foam Mattress Review

Newsletters :: SpaceDaily Express :: SpaceWar Express :: TerraDaily Express :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News

.

The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2012 - Space Media Network. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. Privacy Statement