|
. | . |
|
by Staff Writers Moscow (AFP) June 20, 2008 Moscow and Washington have agreed a deal in principle over the supply of Russian weaponry to the Afghan army in its fight against the Taliban insurgency, senior diplomats announced in a statement Friday. The deal was signed in the Russian capital as part of the United States-Russia Working Group on Counterterrorism (CTWG), although no immediate figures were put on any Russian supplies. "An agreement in principle to provide Russian military material to the Afghanistan National Army," was concluded during a two-day meeting of the CTWG, the communique said. Twin NATO and US operations are currently active in Afghanistan, following the US-led invasion of 2001. Russia, as part of the then Soviet Union, fought an 11-year war in Afghanistan from 1978 to 1989. "We in the past have already provided military equipment to Afghanistan and we feel there is now a demand by the Afghan population and the ability of Afghanistan to take its security in its own hands," Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Kislyak told reporters. Kislyak said it was "possible" that Russia could increase the delivery of arms to Afghanistan. "It is possible but I would not be eager to put a number on it," he answered in reponse to a specific question. Kislyak was speaking alongside the Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs, William J. Burns, as part of the conclusions of the 16th meeting of the CTWG, which meets alternately in Moscow and Washington. The CTWG works to improve bilateral cooperation between Russia and the United States, whilst also concentrating on Afghanistan, the fight against drug trafficking, the financing of armed extremist groups and weapons of mass destruction. The Taliban have launched a deadly insurgency since being removed from power in Kabul in 2001. There are currently around 70,000 foreign troops in the country.
earlier related report Egon Ramms told German public radio station Deutschlandfunk that the situation would only worsen later this year when US forces withdraw some of their troops from Afghanistan if NATO did not send more troops. "We are talking about a total of 5,000, 6,000 soldiers," he said. "But we need these soldiers now and very soon as we need to hold onto certain areas because we need to create trust among the Afghan population and because we want to hand over this responsibility in 2010, 2011 or 2012 to the Afghan forces when they are prepared. "In other words, the forces that I am now lacking could delay the withdrawal of NATO and ISAF," the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force. Ramms said NATO also needed to speed up the training of Afghan police forces, adding that it had fallen two-and-a-half years behind the training of the Afghan army. He also called for more contact between ISAF and Afghan civilians, saying it would undermine the power of insurgents. "The key to success in fighting the Taliban is with the local population," he said, adding that in regions where ISAF enjoyed the trust of residents, it was better informed about planned attacks. Despite the presence of about 70,000 international troops from some 40 countries mainly operating under NATO, an insurgency aimed at toppling the US-backed government in Kabul has gained pace in the past two years. German Defence Minister Franz Josef Jung said Saturday he favours bolstering Germany's military presence in Afghanistan -- currently fixed at 3,500 troops -- by another 1,000 soldiers. Parliament is to decide later this year on prolonging Germany's participation in the NATO force and reshaping its mission amid repeated NATO calls for it to bolster its presence in the country.
Related Links News From Across The Stans
|
|
The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2014 - Space Media Network. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. Privacy Statement |