Subscribe free to our newsletters via your
. 24/7 Space News .




CLIMATE SCIENCE
IPCC must consider alternate policy views
by Staff Writers
Princeton NJ (SPX) Jul 08, 2014


File image.

In addition to providing regular assessments of scientific literature, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Process (IPCC) also produces a "Summary for Policymakers" intended to highlight relevant policy issues through data.

While the summary presents powerful scientific evidence, it goes through an approval process in which governments can question wording and the selection of findings but not alter scientific facts or introduce statements at odds with the science.

In particular, during this process, the most recent summary on mitigation policies was stripped of several important figures and paragraphs that were in the scientists' draft, leading some IPCC scientists to express concerns about excessive political intrusion.

Delicate issues of political interpretation cannot be avoided, wrote three IPCC authors in the journal Science. In their analysis, the team - which includes Marc Fleurbaey from Princeton University's Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs - uses global emissions data to show how multiple political interpretations can be made from the same dataset. They argue that the IPCC should consider a writing process that better connects scientific findings with multiple political outcomes.

"The IPCC should consider opening up more channels for dialogue in which salient political discussions are connected to relevant scientific material," said the article's co-author Marc Fleurbaey, the Robert E. Kuenne Professor in Economics, Humanistic Studies and Public Affairs.

"Such a collaboration or coproduction is what lends the IPCC its credibility as the voice of scientists - but with more weight for policy."

While the IPCC undoubtedly produces the most up-to-date, comprehensive scientific reports on climate change, its approval process has become tediously extensive. As the panel embarks upon its sixth assessment, those involved have been working toward streamlining the process.

In their review, Fleurbaey and his co-authors - Navroz Dubash from the Centre for Policy Research in India and Sivan Kartha from the Stockholm Environment Institute - write that this approval process sets the IPCC apart from other technical reports. Instead of changing the approval process, they suggest an alternate vision for articulating science and policy at the IPCC.

To illustrate their vision, the researchers analyzed global emissions by reviewing income growth across countries, a key driver of emissions growth. When looking at income, countries are sometimes grouped into such categories as lower-income, lower-middle income, upper-middle income and high-income.

The trouble, however, is that some countries are rapidly changing in terms of income, which elides relevant information. Likewise, a few big countries can dominate the statistics, and the time reference used for grouping them also can lead to large differences.

When global emissions are analyzed according to groupings based on current income figures, upper-middle income countries account for 75 percent of the rise in global emissions from 2000 to 2010. This presentation of data was deleted from the recent summary report. A political interpretation of this, Fleurbaey and his collaborators write, may be that country groupings should reflect the increasing role of upper-middle income countries and perhaps impose commensurate emission limits.

However, when grouping countries according to their income in the middle of the decade (2005), global emissions rose three quarters in lower-middle income countries, a change due in part to the fact that China joined the upper-middle income group in 2010 only. This presentation highlighting lower-middle income countries may suggest supporting these countries financially and technologically in developing lower carbon economies.

"As you can see, both representations would be equally faithful to the underlying data, but they are also equally synthetic and incomplete, and they differ markedly in their political extrapolations," said Fleurbaey.

"It's hard to accurately group these countries without imposing political perceptions, and analysis by country groups is highly sensitive in the current context of the renegotiation of the groups defined in the Kyoto protocol."

As an illustration that more positive outcomes can be obtained from governmental dealings, the authors report that some sections benefited from the approval process, as they were eventually expanded and clarified by additional explanations. For example, the framing section of the summary, which was taken up for discussion early in the approval process, achieved a smooth convergence between the authors and country delegates.

On the flip side, the international cooperation section was much shortened, simplified and seemingly stripped of controversy. This section had much less time allowed for discussion and was examined in a contentious atmosphere after the removal of several figures involving country groupings.

Fellow IPCC author Michael Oppenheimer, the Albert G. Milbank Professor of Geosciences and International Affairs in the Woodrow Wilson School and Department of Geosciences, who was not an author of the Science article, fully supported its position.

"IPCC, and attempts to solve the climate problem, would benefit immensely from a strengthening of the science-policy interface," Oppenheimer said. "Proposals to completely separate the science and policy functions are simply wrong-headed and self-defeating. This collaboration is what makes IPCC unique and uniquely effective"

"Seemingly technical choices can crystallize into value-laden political conclusions, particularly given tight word and time limits," said Fleurbaey. "It is more productive for authors to be aware of the varying political implications and factor these into their representations of data."

.


Related Links
Princeton University, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs
Climate Science News - Modeling, Mitigation Adaptation






Comment on this article via your Facebook, Yahoo, AOL, Hotmail login.

Share this article via these popular social media networks
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit GoogleGoogle








CLIMATE SCIENCE
Putting a price tag on the 2 degree climate target
Laxenburg, Austria (SPX) Jul 04, 2014
Addressing climate change will require substantial new investment in low-carbon energy and energy efficiency - but no more than what is currently spent on today's fossil-dominated energy system, according to new research from IIASA and partners. To limit climate change to 2 Celsius, low-carbon energy options will need additional investments of about US $800 billion a year globally from no ... read more


CLIMATE SCIENCE
NASA LRO's Moon As Art Collection Is Revealed

Solar photons drive water off the moon

55-year old dark side of the moon mystery solved

New evidence supporting moon formation via collision of 2 planets

CLIMATE SCIENCE
First LDSD Test Flight a Success

Rover Has Enough Energy for Some Late-Night Work

Curiosity travels through ancient glaciers on Mars

New Type of Dust in Martian Atmosphere Discovered

CLIMATE SCIENCE
Taiwan's tourism revenue hits record high in 2013

Fruit fly immunity fails with fungus after (space)flight

From Deep Sea to Deep Space

Commercial Crew Partners Focus on Testing, Analysis to Advance Designs

CLIMATE SCIENCE
Chinese moon rover designer shooting for Mars

Yutu designer's bittersweet

Are China's Astronauts Moonbound

Chinese scientists prepare for lunar base life support system

CLIMATE SCIENCE
NASA Television Coverage Set for Orbital-2 Mission to Space Station

Spot the Space Station looking at you

Closing the recycling circle

Space station astronauts wager friendly bet on USA vs. Germany match

CLIMATE SCIENCE
Eco-Friendly 'Angara' Rocket Installed On Plesetsk Launch Pad

Singapore launches its first nano-satellite

NASA's sounding rocket crashes into Atlantic

NASA aborts launch of OCO-2

CLIMATE SCIENCE
Discovery expands search for Earth-like planets

Astronomers discover most Earth-like of all exoplanets

Mega-Earth in Draco Smashes Notions of Planetary Formation

Kepler space telescope ready to start new hunt for exoplanets

CLIMATE SCIENCE
Even geckos can lose their grip

Platonic solids generate their four-dimensional analogues

Consider the 'Anticrystal'

Inspired by Nature, Researchers Create Tougher Metal Materials




The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2014 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. Privacy Statement All images and articles appearing on Space Media Network have been edited or digitally altered in some way. Any requests to remove copyright material will be acted upon in a timely and appropriate manner. Any attempt to extort money from Space Media Network will be ignored and reported to Australian Law Enforcement Agencies as a potential case of financial fraud involving the use of a telephonic carriage device or postal service.