Subscribe free to our newsletters via your
. 24/7 Space News .




STELLAR CHEMISTRY
Galaxies Demand A Stellar Recount
by Staff Writers
Pasadena CA (JPL) Aug 20, 2009


This diagram illustrates the extent to which astronomers have been underestimating the proportion of small to big stars in certain galaxies. Data from NASA's Galaxy Evolution Explorer spacecraft and the Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory in Chile have shown that, in some cases, there can be as many as four times more small stars compared to large ones. In the diagram, a massive blue star is shown next to a stack of lighter, yellow stars. These big blue stars are three to 20 times more massive than our sun, while the smaller stars are typically about the same mass as the sun or smaller. Before the Galaxy Evolution Explorer study, astronomers assumed there were 500 small stars for every massive one (lower stack on right). The new observations reveal that, in certain galaxies, this estimation is off by a factor of four; for every massive star, there could be as many as 2,000 small counterparts (entire stack on right). NASA/JPL-Caltech

For decades, astronomers have gone about their business of studying the cosmos with the assumption that stars of certain sizes form in certain quantities. Like grocery stores selling melons alone, and blueberries in bags of dozens or more, the universe was thought to create stars in specific bundles.

In other words, the proportion of small to big stars was thought to be fixed. For every star 20 or more times as massive as the sun, for example, there should be 500 stars with the sun's mass or less.

This belief, based on years of research, has been tipped on its side with new data from NASA's Galaxy Evolution Explorer. The ultraviolet telescope has found proof that small stars come in even bigger bundles than previously believed; for example, in some places in the cosmos, about 2,000 low-mass stars may form for each massive star. The little stars were there all along but masked by massive, brighter stars.

"What this paper is showing is that some of the standard assumptions that we've had - that the brightest stars tell you about the whole population of stars - this doesn't seem to work, at least not in a constant way," said Gerhardt R. Meurer, principal investigator on the study and a research scientist at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md.

Astronomers have long known that many stars are too dim to be seen in the glare of their brighter, more massive counterparts. Though the smaller, lighter stars outnumber the big ones, they are harder to see. Going back to a grocery story analogy, the melons grab your eyes, even though the total weight of the blueberries may be more.

Beginning in the 1950s, astronomers came up with a method for counting all the stars in a region, even the ones they couldn't detect. They devised a sort of stellar budget, an equation called the "stellar initial mass function," to estimate the total number of stars in an area of the sky based on the light from only the brightest and most massive.

For every large star formed, a set number of smaller ones were thought to have been created regardless of where the stars sat in the universe.

"We tried to understand properties of galaxies and their mass by looking at the light we can see," Meurer said.

But this common assumption has been leading astronomers astray, said Meurer, especially in galaxies that are intrinsically small and faint.

To understand the problem, imagine trying to estimate the population on Earth by observing light emitted at night. Looking from above toward North America or Europe, the regions where more people live light up like signposts. Los Angeles, for example, is easily visible to a scientist working on the International Space Station.

However, if this method were applied to regions where people have limited electricity, populations would be starkly underestimated, for example in some sections of Africa.

The same can be said of galaxies, whose speckles of light in the dark of space can be misleading. Meurer and his team used ultraviolet images from the Galaxy Evolution Explorer and carefully filtered red-light images from telescopes at the Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory in Chile to show that many galaxies do not form a lot of massive stars, yet still have plenty of lower-mass counterparts.

The ultraviolet images are sensitive to somewhat small stars three times or more massive than the sun, while the filtered optical images are only sensitive to the largest stars with 20 or more times the mass of the sun.

The effects are particularly important in parts of the universe where stars are spread out over a larger volume - the rural Africa of the cosmos. There could be about four times as many stars in these regions than previously estimated.

"Especially in these galaxies that seem small and piddling, there can be a lot more mass in lower mass stars than we had previously expected from what we could see from the brightest, youngest stars," Meurer said. "But we can now reduce these errors using satellites like the Galaxy Evolution Explorer."

This research was published in the April 10, 2009, issue of Astrophysical Journal.

.


Related Links
Galex at Caltech
Stellar Chemistry, The Universe And All Within It






Comment on this article via your Facebook, Yahoo, AOL, Hotmail login.

Share this article via these popular social media networks
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit GoogleGoogle








STELLAR CHEMISTRY
Super Planetary Nebulae
Sydney, Australia (SPX) Aug 17, 2009
A team of scientists in Australia and the United States, led by Associate Professor Miroslav Filipovic from the University of Western Sydney, have discovered a new class of object which they call "Super Planetary Nebulae." They report their work in the journal Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. Planetary nebulae are shells of gas and dust expelled by stars near the end of ... read more


STELLAR CHEMISTRY
The Ultimate Long Distance Communication

Microsats For The Moon

India And Russia Complete Design Of New Lunar Probe

Germany may target the moon by 2015

STELLAR CHEMISTRY
Spirit Hits 2000 Sols On Mars Duty

Spirit Hits 2000

Roving The AMASEing Arctic

Planned Rover Test To Run A Week Or More

STELLAR CHEMISTRY
Jack Swigert Aerospace Academy Opens

Food Vital During Long Space Flights

Tight budget quashes US space ambitions: panel

Astronauts Test Use Of Nutritional Supplements In Space

STELLAR CHEMISTRY
Russia launches China communications satellite: report

China Conducts Stringent Tests Of Would-Be Spacemen

Chinese Astronauts Must Be Super Human

China bans bad breath in space: report

STELLAR CHEMISTRY
ESA's Swedish Astronaut To Return To The ISS

Astronomy Question Of The Week: Why Do The Planets Break Ranks?

ESA Astronaut Andre Kuipers To Spend Six Months On The ISS Starting In 2011

Finnish President Receives Phone Call From Space

STELLAR CHEMISTRY
Ariane To Launch JCSAT-12 And Optus D3 Friday

Space Systems/Loral Delivers Telesat's Nimiq 5 Satellite To Launch Base

South Korea's First Rocket Set Up On Launch Pad

Ariane 5 Ready For This Week's Launch

STELLAR CHEMISTRY
A Look Into The Hellish Cradles Of Suns And Solar Systems

New Planet Orbits Backwards

Huge New Planet Tells Of Game Of Planetary Billiards

Planet Smash-Up Sends Rock And Lava Flying

STELLAR CHEMISTRY
Pakistan To Launch First Satellite In 2011

Sony adopting industry standard for e-books

College e-textbooks go to class in iPhones

MEADS Receives Hardware Design Approvals, Enters System-Level CDR




The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2014 - Space Media Network. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. Privacy Statement