Subscribe to our free daily newsletters
. 24/7 Space News .




Subscribe to our free daily newsletters



Senators Deplore Lack Of Vision In US Space Program

Can we go back?

...it clearly is the only place where we should invest a single dime on manned space,... never forget that the only reason we exist is because the moon came to be there,... it's barely three days sail and mere light seconds away in cyberspace,... it's Sol's perfect nursery to it's ultimate creation,... us?
 Washington (AFP) Sep 04, 2003
US Senators Wednesday criticized lack of vision in the US space program but NASA Adminstrator Sean O'Keefe, grilled over the crash of the space shuttle Columbia, expressed determination the program would go on. Democratic and Republican senators alike deplored findings of a report issued in late August investigating February's Columbia disaster. "We are stuck mentally in a low space orbit," said Kansas Republican Sam Brownback, speaking at a hearing of the Senate's Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee.

The committee focused on a late August report by investigators looking into the Columbia disaster, which stated that the US space agency's culture contributed significantly to the loss of the shuttle.

"I hope you think about creating this presidential commission on the future of space exploration," Brownback told O'Keefe.

Congress can do that, Brownback said, "but it's really the executive branch function, and the report noted that we lack a comprehensive and engaging vision."

In reply to senators' request for a new outline of  NASA's objectives for the space program, O'Keefe replied: "We have been pursuing an interagency process designed to articulate the broader US exploration objectives and from that we'll form a range of strategic options.

"The administration has got a strong interest" in the program, he said.

"I have no problem raising an audience over there (in the White House)," O'Keefe said. "I will not preempt the president's option and venues, that should not be confused with indifference."

Brownback said he believed the United States "wants to engage in a discussion of what our vision for space is, not only NASA."

That vision "involves exploration but it's also commercial and military," he said.

An equally frustrated Democrat, Byron Dorgan of North Dakota, said: "I believe a society that stops exploring stops progressing. Space exploration has been very important for this country. I want to succeed, I want it to continue."

Bill Nelson, a Democrat from Florida and himself a former shuttle astronaut, warned O'Keefe against the danger of allowing the administration of President George W. Bush to perpetuate the mistakes and lack of vision of the previous three administrations in continuing to trim the shuttle program budget.

"The cost cutting has been part of the problem," said Nelson. "NASA has been starved of funds over four administrations and it has always been the (White House's) Office of Management and Budget that has said 'nyet' to NASA."

Nelson read from the Columbia disaster report, which said that funds destined to the shuttle program have been cut by 40 percent over the past 10 years.

"I think everybody wants to see our space program to be robust and fulfill that desire of the nation to explore," he said.

O'Keefe later told the committee that NASA will next Monday present a calendar whereby it plans to relaunch space shuttle flights, at the Johnson Space Center in Houston.

The implementation plan "will identify everything that we intend to do, the process we will engage in to implement the findings of the Gehman investigation board, comply with its recommendations," the NASA boss said.

And grilled as to NASA level of determination to see the space flights up and running again, O'Keefe said: "We intend to implement this so that we can do what? Fly!"

O'Keefe did not give a date for the resumption of shuttle flights.

All rights reserved. 2003 Agence France-Presse. Sections of the information displayed on this page (dispatches, photographs, logos) are protected by intellectual property rights owned by Agence France-Presse. As a consequence, you may not copy, reproduce, modify, transmit, publish, display or in any way commercially exploit any of the content of this section without the prior written consent of Agence France-Presse.

Related Links
International Lunar Conference 2003
SpaceDaily
Search SpaceDaily
Subscribe To SpaceDaily Express

"Hindsight Bias" Could Hide Real Lessons Of Columbia Accident Report, Expert Says
Columbus - Sep 03, 2003
A psychological effect known as "hindsight bias" might cause people to misinterpret the conclusions of the Columbia Accident Investigation Board (CAIB), according to an Ohio State University researcher who helped the board during its probe.



Thanks for being here;
We need your help. The SpaceDaily news network continues to grow but revenues have never been harder to maintain.

With the rise of Ad Blockers, and Facebook - our traditional revenue sources via quality network advertising continues to decline. And unlike so many other news sites, we don't have a paywall - with those annoying usernames and passwords.

Our news coverage takes time and effort to publish 365 days a year.

If you find our news sites informative and useful then please consider becoming a regular supporter or for now make a one off contribution.

SpaceDaily Contributor
$5 Billed Once


credit card or paypal
SpaceDaily Monthly Supporter
$5 Billed Monthly


paypal only






Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News








The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2016 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. Privacy Statement All images and articles appearing on Space Media Network have been edited or digitally altered in some way. Any requests to remove copyright material will be acted upon in a timely and appropriate manner. Any attempt to extort money from Space Media Network will be ignored and reported to Australian Law Enforcement Agencies as a potential case of financial fraud involving the use of a telephonic carriage device or postal service.