. 24/7 Space News .
Piece Of Foam Smashes Through Shuttle Wing Section In Key Test

firing a piece of foam at a shuttle wing section at the estimated impact speed that the foam debris hit Columbia on launch left a telling result. NASA image
San Antonio (AFP) Jul 08, 2003
Investigators of the space shuttle Columbia disaster said Monday they had found the "smoking gun" -- proof that a piece of foam insulation damaged a heat shield, causing the ship to break up on re-entry.

In a test, investigators fired a 1.67-pound (0.75-kilo) chunk of the foam at a panel taken from another shuttle's wing.

A 10.6-meter (35-foot) nitrogen-pressurized gun sent the suitcase-sized piece of foam hurtling into the wing panel at 800 kilometers (500 miles) per hour, opening a 40-centimeter (16-inch) hole with a blast so strong that it broke one of the gauges tracking the experiment.

"We have found the smoking gun," Columbia Accident Investigation Board member Scott Hubbard said.

"This is in fact the most probable cause creating the breach that led to the accident of the Columbia, the loss of crew and vehicle."

Hubbard also said he believed repairing the damage to the wing while the shuttle orbited the Earth would have been nearly impossible.

Columbia disintegrated over the US state of Texas February 1 as it was headed for landing at Cape Canaveral, Florida, after a science mission that did not include a visit to the International Space Station. All seven astronauts aboard died.

A piece of foam separated from the external fuel tank after launch and damaged the left wing of the craft.

After the foam was fired, making a hole in the wing panel, reporters and officials on hand let out an audible gasp.

"It was a visceral reaction," Hubbard said.

The damage allowed hot gases to pierce the shuttle's protective shield during descent and ultimately caused its disintegration, according to investigators.

The board has performed six previous tests. The foam caused far less damage to the panel. However, one block of foam did crack the carbon coating while another made a crack the size of a dime where two of the panels connect.

However, Monday's test was the first convincing proof that the foam could breach the "carbon-carbon" sheeting.

"I felt surprised at how it appeared, such a dramatic punch-through," Hubbard said.

"But it is the ... type of damage that must have occurred to bring down the orbiter."

Having established a cause makes it more likely that the board will be able to complete its report and to submit it to Congress by the end of July. However, whether NASA will get the shuttles flying by early next year as it hopes is still an open matter. Much depends on Congress and the White House.

The board has already recommended finding a way to repair such damage once the shuttle is in space to avoid another deadly re-entry. However, the size of the hole produced by Monday's blast means the panel will have to work harder to find a solution.

A former professor of aerospace engineering at St. Louis University said the damage to Columbia's wing could have been fairly small. If it had been large, the Columbia would have broken up even earlier.

"Once you had a crack through the leading edge, all the way through like the second test, it was going to fail," Paul Czysz, said.

"All you're arguing over now is it going to burn up over Los Angeles, over New Mexico or over Texas."

The hardened material on the leading edges of the wings wards off gasses as hot as 1,600 degrees C (3,000 degrees F) and is also on the shuttle's distinctive black nose cone.

The material is not designed to absorb impact, let alone the large chunk of foam that hit Columbia 82 seconds after liftoff.

Although smaller pieces have broken loose previously on liftoff, the piece that hit the shuttle was unusually large.

"That confirms our worst fears, that when (NASA) did not tend to the fact of that foam coming off, they did not understand the engineering and design of those ... panels, and therefore, let slip what is to be the cause of the disaster," said Florida Senator Bill Nelson who flew aboard Columbia in 1986 and sits on the Senate committee that oversees NASA.

All rights reserved. � 2003 Agence France-Presse. Sections of the information displayed on this page (dispatches, photographs, logos) are protected by intellectual property rights owned by Agence France-Presse. As a consequence, you may not copy, reproduce, modify, transmit, publish, display or in any way commercially exploit any of the content of this section without the prior written consent of Agence France-Presse.

Related Links
Columibia Accident Investigation Board
Shuttle at NASA
SpaceDaily
Search SpaceDaily
Subscribe To SpaceDaily Express

ISS Gets New Job As Shuttle Pit Stop
Arlington - Jun 30, 2003
The Columbia Accident Investigation Board today issued its third preliminary recommendation to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, in advance of its appearance in the final report.



Thanks for being here;
We need your help. The SpaceDaily news network continues to grow but revenues have never been harder to maintain.

With the rise of Ad Blockers, and Facebook - our traditional revenue sources via quality network advertising continues to decline. And unlike so many other news sites, we don't have a paywall - with those annoying usernames and passwords.

Our news coverage takes time and effort to publish 365 days a year.

If you find our news sites informative and useful then please consider becoming a regular supporter or for now make a one off contribution.
SpaceDaily Contributor
$5 Billed Once


credit card or paypal
SpaceDaily Monthly Supporter
$5 Billed Monthly


paypal only














The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2016 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. Privacy Statement All images and articles appearing on Space Media Network have been edited or digitally altered in some way. Any requests to remove copyright material will be acted upon in a timely and appropriate manner. Any attempt to extort money from Space Media Network will be ignored and reported to Australian Law Enforcement Agencies as a potential case of financial fraud involving the use of a telephonic carriage device or postal service.