. 24/7 Space News .
Why Fear Won't Sell Space

fear sells newspapers
Honolulu (SPX) Aug 20, 2004
Jim Oberg has written an excellent article that clears away a lot of mythology about the Golden Age of American manned spaceflight in the 1960s. He cuts right to the heart of the Apollo program... Fear!

It is impossible now to appreciate the real sense of fear that existed in the West in the wake of Sputnik I. No event between Pearl Harbor and 9/11/01 had more shock effect on the US government and people.

Back then there was genuine concern that the Communists would pull ahead in science, technology, and nuclear weapons while we capitalists fussed around with bigger tailfins on our cars.

Even the CIA was predicting that the USSR would pull ahead economically by 1982, just like Khrushchev promised. I recall an editorial in LIFE magazine that actually advised us that panic was an appropriate response.

And this concern existed just as strongly in many other nations as well.

Opinion polling conducted in "non-aligned" countries revealed a real shift in public perceptions of the relative strength of the competing alliances. As Osama bin Laden said much later: "Offer people a choice between a weak horse and a strong horse, and they will always choose to go with the strong horse." The democratic free-market system looked like the weak horse in 1957-65.

But Oberg's article leaves out an interesting aspect of the Fear Factor: the fact that it doesn't work anymore, despite numerous attempts by space advocates to use it to puff up government expenditures on space travel.

Back in the late 1980s (when the USSR was visibly collapsing) the fear of "The Rising Yen" from a fully rebuilt and techno-charged Japan was a popular bogeyman. The NASP crowd constantly claimed that Japan was about to start a huge hypersonic research program. Of course this went the way of the Japanese fifth generation computer program and their analog HDTV system, billion dollar failures that are forgotten today.

More recently it has become customary to trot out a new Yellow Peril from China.

Ex-Congressman Bob Walker has become notorious for this during his second career as a hired lobbyist for the US aerospace industry. At every opportunity during the past few years, he has promoted wildly exaggerated claims about the Chinese space program and its dire implications.

I once thought that this scam could actually work. Most people seem to have a wildly exaggerated view of China's current power and technical base, probably derived from all those cheap but efficient Chinese products they buy at K-Mart.

But then China did fly a man in orbit, and hardly anyone cared. It was a p.14 story in most media outlets. This lack of interest is about the only aspect of the current space crisis that was a surprise to me. Even Bob Walker seems to have given up; he was a member of the Aldridge Commission, but very little "Yellow Peril" rhetoric showed up in their final report.

Why aren't people scared? I can't speak for the masses, but I can speak for myself and other intelligent observers. Many people keep close tabs on China because they are the only government on the planet A) stupid and nationalistic enough to provoke a war with the USA and B) big enough to cause real damage if they had a modern military.

Fortunately, there are two Chinese economies: the new capitalist one on the coast that makes that stuff at K-Mart, and the old Red rustbelt economy of the interior. It's the old rusty socialist industrial base that designs and makes China's airplanes, missiles, and other weapons. The results are terrible - fortunate, but hardly surprising.

Every nation that has bought Chinese weapons finds that they are hopelessly obsolete in design and dangerously defective in manufacture. In Iraq, ordnance disposal teams find that Chinese-made ammunition will often explode spontaneously just from being left out in the summer sun. In Pakistan, brand-new Chinese tanks fresh off the boat are run through a huge "repair" depot that dismantles and remanufactures them to meet Western quality standards.

And the Red Chinese aerospace industry is the worst part of this noncompetitive Iron Rice Bowl system. They have spent 40 years trying to develop improved versions of pre-1961 Soviet aircraft designs and failed every time.

In the 1990s, they even failed to copy the ex-Soviet Su-27 even with the help of the Sukhoi Design Bureau, and were forced to buy the planes ready-made at a much greater cost. If they decided to fight Taiwan today, most Chinese squadrons would be flying the MiG-19 against Mirage 2000s and F-16s!

At international arms shows, the Chinese state firms are always showing models and posters of advanced high-tech missiles, but somehow they never seem to actually hit the market, or even get deployed with China's own forces. Possibly this is because Chinese generals spend so much money on dressing their troops in the flashy comic-opera uniforms that all totalitarian states seem to love.

Chinese space boosters seem to be a little better than their military aircraft and missiles, but not by much. Their Long March series has a terrible record of crashes, in which at least two farm villages have been incinerated with human losses that are certainly far larger than the absurd official figures. The Shenzhou program has been characterized by long periods of assembly and checkout. In at least one case a booster was dismantled and returned to the factory for rework.

Indeed the pace of the Shenzhou project is so slow that I have often wondered what the launch crews do to entertain themselves out in the Gobi Desert in the ~1yr intervals between launches. The answer is clear from a satellite picture on a recent cover of Aerospace America: most of the base is covered with the distinctive pattern of irrigated farming based on the center-pivot system.

So my take on the Chinese manned space program is that it is a cheaper copy of Nikita Khrushchev's space program - a propaganda exercise to conceal the weakness of their obsolete mass army in the age of smart bombs (both from the ignorant masses abroad and their own people). The low funding and the glacially slow schedule are consistent with this. Even their sudden decision to have women taikonauts (taikonettes?) is vintage Khrushchev.

This propaganda exercise may fool the Chinese people in their little walled-off corner of the Internet, but its not fooling anyone on the outside. It's not 1957 any more. Back then the outside world was totally ignorant about the true nature of the Soviet missile program before spy satellites ripped off the veil of secrecy. Today we know the Chinese program much better and it just is not scary enough to justify a big response.

In fact, the details that have leaked out about the new Bush administration space initiative suggest that it will also be a modest program, carefully scaled to keep the US just barely ahead of China in space at minimum cost.

Frank Seitzen says that the new program is designed around a 4-person vehicle that will fly to the Moon once per year. (This agrees with a calculation I did some time ago based on the surplus capacity of US booster factories.) Shenzhou appears just big enough for 3 or 4 seats and flies about 0.7 times per year.

So if there really is a "New Space Race" as a hysterical headline assures us every three months or so, it will be a race between the tortoise and the snail. Nationalistic competition is no longer a reason for a real manned space program, and it is unlikely that it ever will be again. Space advocates need to find a stronger horse to put their money behind, because this one is played out.

Jeffrey F. Bell is a retired space scientist and recovering pro-space activist.

Related Links
SpaceDaily
Search SpaceDaily
Subscribe To SpaceDaily Express

White Paper: China's Space Activities
Beijing (XNA) Aug 06, 2004
Introduction - The scope of mankind's activities has experienced expansion from land to ocean, from ocean to atmosphere, and from atmosphere to outer space. Space technology, which emerged in the 1950s, opened up a new era of man's exploration of outer space.



Thanks for being here;
We need your help. The SpaceDaily news network continues to grow but revenues have never been harder to maintain.

With the rise of Ad Blockers, and Facebook - our traditional revenue sources via quality network advertising continues to decline. And unlike so many other news sites, we don't have a paywall - with those annoying usernames and passwords.

Our news coverage takes time and effort to publish 365 days a year.

If you find our news sites informative and useful then please consider becoming a regular supporter or for now make a one off contribution.
SpaceDaily Contributor
$5 Billed Once


credit card or paypal
SpaceDaily Monthly Supporter
$5 Billed Monthly


paypal only














The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2016 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. Privacy Statement All images and articles appearing on Space Media Network have been edited or digitally altered in some way. Any requests to remove copyright material will be acted upon in a timely and appropriate manner. Any attempt to extort money from Space Media Network will be ignored and reported to Australian Law Enforcement Agencies as a potential case of financial fraud involving the use of a telephonic carriage device or postal service.