The Lost Worlds Of Orion

EXOWORLDS

There is much controversy as to how these "inbetween" objects should be classified. Some astronomers say that as these may have been formed like a star, they should not be called planets. The authors of this paper suggest that a new term - planetars - may be a good compromise.

Cambridge - April 3, 2001
Astronomers have known for many years that stars form when the cores of giant clouds of cold molecular material fragment and collapse. However, the details of the star formation process are poorly understood. In particular, the smallest fragments that can collapse to form very low mass stars or sub-stellar objects have not yet been identified.

Dr. Philip Lucas (University of Hertfordshire) and Dr. Patrick Roche (Oxford University) controversially announced last year that they had directly observed 13 faint points of light in Orion (a giant stellar nursery where thousands of stars are being born) which appeared to have masses closer to those of the giant planets - a few times more massive than Jupiter in our Solar System - than the stars.

On Tuesday 3 April, the same pair will announce at the UK National Astronomy Meeting in Cambridge that they have confirmed their discovery of 'free floating planets' in the Orion Nebula.

Their measurements of the spectrum of the infrared light from 20 objects in the Nebula show the characteristic signature of water vapour.

This confirms that these objects are indeed young, low-mass bodies, and that the faintest of them are of planetary mass. These planetary mass objects can only be seen because they are very young and still warm after the process of formation.

Dr Lucas commented, "It's exciting to find these planet-sized objects floating around in space, unlike planets such as our Earth which orbit a star. Our new results provide the first steps in the exploration of their physical properties."

"The identification and study of these objects is extremely interesting in itself," added Dr. Roche, "but it can also aid our understanding of the star formation process, which is one of the major mysteries in astronomy."

This proof is sure to add fuel to the controversy of how such objects were born. Are they actually planets, thrown out of their solar systems and now floating in space, or have they been formed directly from a gas cloud in space, much like a normal star is?

There is also controversy over how to classify these "inbetween" objects. Some astronomers say that as these may have been formed like a star, they should not be called planets. The authors suggest that a new term - planetars - may be a good compromise.

Lucas and Roche were following up their discovery of these objects last year, when they measured faint points of light in the Orion Nebula - a vast cloud of gas and dust that can be seen with the naked eye as the middle 'star' in the sword of the constellation of Orion.

Their observations were made in infrared light, using the United Kingdom Infrared Telescope at Mauna Kea Observatory, Hawaii.

This sparked a wide controversy among scientists, with some arguing that the result was a mistake because the planets might be normal stars far behind Orion and just happened to look like very young planets.

Now Lucas and Roche have used the same telescope to analyse the light from these giant worlds at different frequencies and shown that they must be inside the Orion Nebula.

By studying the spectrum of the light from the planets, they were able to measure the temperature of the objects, and then, with the use of theoretical models, derive their masses.

The spectroscopic analysis shows strong absorption features due to water vapour in the atmospheres of these objects, which shows that they are not hot enough to be distant stars.

The results have been strengthened with the help of theoretical work on the atmospheres by France Allard and Isabelle Baraffe of the Ecole Normale Superieure at Lyon in France and by Peter Hauschildt at the University of Georgia in the United States. Lucas, Roche, Allard and Hauschildt analysed 20 of the brown dwarfs and planet candidates in the Orion Nebula to confirm the result.

The so-called 'planets' float in space by themselves, not orbiting any star. They are thought to be between 5 and 13 times as massive as the planet Jupiter, so they are rather large by the standards of our Solar System and are most unlikely to support life.

However, these worlds are not massive enough to shine by nuclear fusion, the process that powers the Sun and the stars. Nor are they massive enough for even the meagre nuclear reactions that occur in 'brown dwarfs', objects with masses between those of planets and stars.

The scientists admit that there is a slight chance that they are misinterpreting the data.

If all the theoretical calculations for these poorly understood objects are wrong, or if they are far older than the stars and brown dwarfs around them, there is an outside chance that they are actually 20 or 30 times the mass of Jupiter - too big to be called planets.

However, all the evidence found so far points to them being free-floating planets, and other astronomers in Japan and Spain are beginning to find signs of more and more planets in other nebulae like Orion.

A paper on the subject is currently going through the peer review process for the journal 'Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society'.

EXOWORLDS

Search For Distant Biospheres Sniffs First Molecules Of Life

San Francisco - Feb. 21, 2001
Using spectral tools for submillimeter wave and infrared observations, astronomers are looking for the building blocks of life in all the right places: where there might be oxygen and where it is wet. "We may now have the tools to find those elements that are the preconditions for life." says Martin Harwit, professor emeritus of astronomy at Cornell University in Ithaca, N.Y.

Thanks for being here; We need your help. The SpaceDaily news network continues to grow but revenues have never been harder to maintain. With the rise of Ad Blockers, and Facebook - our traditional revenue sources via quality network advertising continues to decline. And unlike so many other news sites, we don't have a paywall - with those annoying usernames and passwords. Our news coverage takes time and effort to publish 365 days a year. If you find our news sites informative and useful then please consider becoming a regular supporter or for now make a one off contribution.
SpaceDaily Contributor $5 Billed Once credit card or paypal		SpaceDaily Monthly Supporter $5 Billed Monthly paypal only

The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2016 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. Privacy Statement All images and articles appearing on Space Media Network have been edited or digitally altered in some way. Any requests to remove copyright material will be acted upon in a timely and appropriate manner. Any attempt to extort money from Space Media Network will be ignored and reported to Australian Law Enforcement Agencies as a potential case of financial fraud involving the use of a telephonic carriage device or postal service.