 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| . |  |
. |
Washington (AFP) May 27, 2000 - Top US defense experts have concluded that a sea-based missile defense system could be built with existing technology as the Clinton administration struggles to find a way to create credible land-based missile defenses, the Washington Post reported Saturday. The system would be an upgraded version of the US Navy's Aegis air defenses already deployed on 84 cruisers and destroyers, said the Post, citing a classified Defense Department study. The report by the Defense Department's Ballistic Missile Defense Organization was expected to add fuel to the debate over the need for a land-based national missile defense system, which has already failed several key tests and was expected to cost up to 60 billion dollars. Clinton is to decide later this year whether to deploy a land-based defensive shield starting in 2005, a plan, which has raised ire in Europe, China and Russia. A White House spokesman defended the land-based system, which would place 20 interceptor missiles in the state of Alaska in its first phase. "Our proposed national missile defense system is the fastest, most affordable, most technologically mature approach," spokesman P.J. Crowley was quoted by the Post as saying. The short and medium ranges of the existing sea-based system "are not capable of protecting all 50 states from strategic ballistic missiles," he added. But several experts including former CIA director John Deutch have argued that a sea-based system should be deployed while the land-based system is being debated. One of its advantages, according to the Post, is that it could be deployed against specific nations -- in ships anchored off North Korea, for example -- thus minimizing diplomatic fallout of the broader land-based defense systems. "It is much easier to put a lid on North Korea ... than it is to put an umbrella over the whole of the United States," Richard Garwin, a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, was quoted as saying. It was not immediately clear whether a sea-based system would be in compliance with the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty. The United States is seeking to amend the treaty to allow deployment of land-based national defenses.
Copyright 2000 AFP. All rights reserved. The material on this page is provided by AFP and may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
MILSPACE
|
|
| |||||||||
| The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2016 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. Privacy Statement All images and articles appearing on Space Media Network have been edited or digitally altered in some way. Any requests to remove copyright material will be acted upon in a timely and appropriate manner. Any attempt to extort money from Space Media Network will be ignored and reported to Australian Law Enforcement Agencies as a potential case of financial fraud involving the use of a telephonic carriage device or postal service. |
