Free Newsletters - Space News - Defense Alert - Environment Report - Energy Monitor
. 24/7 Space News .




British Scientists Announce Successor To Ill-Fated Beagle Mars Probe

File image of Beagle 2 as some imagined it might have looked like on Mars
London (AFP) Nov 3, 2004
The British team behind the ill-fated Beagle 2 probe to Mars, which vanished without trace last December while attempting to land on the Red Planet, unveiled plans Wednesday for a possible successor mission.

Under the proposal - thus far called "Beagle 2: Evolution" - two identical craft, broadly similar to the earlier craft, would attempt to land on Mars in 2009.

Professor Colin Pillinger, lead scientist on Beagle 2, said that mission controllers would be able to analyse Mars's atmosphere before starting the landings, avoiding the risk of dust storms in the planet's atmosphere.

"Landing must be the priority. You can never ever reduce the risk to zero but you can make it more likely that you will succeed," said Pillinger, from the Planetary and Space Science Institute of the Open University.

"This will be a lot better then last time."

Pillinger's team must now make a presentation to the European Space Agency (ESA) to get the idea accepted as part of a planned 2009 exploration mission.

It was vital that the attempt was launched in 2009, the scientist said: "If we don't go by 2009, conditions after 2009 will get worse and you won't be able to go until a lot later."

The tiny Beagle 2 lander, carried on the ESA Mars Express spacecraft, vanished shortly before it landed on the Red Planet on Christmas Day last year, and scientists are still not sure what went wrong.

The probe had been intended to search for evidence of life on Mars.

A six-month scientific investigation said in August that possible failures could have included electronic problems, a puncture on a cushioning gas bag, a failure of the craft to deploy its instruments, heat shield damage or even the craft landing in a crater.

The probe had been due to flip open like a pocket watch after landing and make contact, but nothing was heard. In contrast, a pair of US probes sent to Mars around the same time landed perfectly and sent back streams of data.

An earlier report into Beagle's loss criticised severe organisational failures with the mission.

On Tuesday, a committee of British lawmakers said in another report that the project failed because the country's government wanted a mission to Mars "on the cheap".

Scientists are working on a series of changes to the Beagle design for the new landers, such as better solar panels, a powerful communications system allowing it direct contact with Earth rather than via an orbiter, and improved airbags to cushion the landing.

All rights reserved. � 2004 Agence France-Presse. Sections of the information displayed on this page (dispatches, photographs, logos) are protected by intellectual property rights owned by Agence France-Presse. As a consequence, you may not copy, reproduce, modify, transmit, publish, display or in any way commercially exploit any of the content of this section without the prior written consent of Agence France-Presse.

Related Links
Beagle 2
SpaceDaily
Search SpaceDaily
Subscribe To SpaceDaily Express

Britain's Beagle Mission To Mars Done 'on The Cheap': Inquiry
London (AFP) Nov 02, 2004
Beagle 2, the ill-fated British space probe that vanished while attempting to land on Mars, failed because the country's government wanted a mission to the Red Planet "on the cheap", a report by lawmakers said Tuesday.



Thanks for being here;
We need your help. The SpaceDaily news network continues to grow but revenues have never been harder to maintain.

With the rise of Ad Blockers, and Facebook - our traditional revenue sources via quality network advertising continues to decline. And unlike so many other news sites, we don't have a paywall - with those annoying usernames and passwords.

Our news coverage takes time and effort to publish 365 days a year.

If you find our news sites informative and useful then please consider becoming a regular supporter or for now make a one off contribution.
SpaceDaily Contributor
$5 Billed Once


credit card or paypal
SpaceDaily Monthly Supporter
$5 Billed Monthly


paypal only














The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2016 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. Privacy Statement All images and articles appearing on Space Media Network have been edited or digitally altered in some way. Any requests to remove copyright material will be acted upon in a timely and appropriate manner. Any attempt to extort money from Space Media Network will be ignored and reported to Australian Law Enforcement Agencies as a potential case of financial fraud involving the use of a telephonic carriage device or postal service.