Subscribe free to our newsletters via your
. 24/7 Space News .




NUKEWARS
Pentagon weighs cuts to nuclear arsenal
by Staff Writers
Washington (AFP) Nov 11, 2011


Under pressure to trim the massive US defense budget, the Pentagon is considering cuts to the country's formidable nuclear arsenal, a costly pillar of American military power.

But there is disagreement over how many atomic bombs the United States requires in the post-Cold War era and debate over the estimated price tag of the atomic weapons.

"America needs another nuclear weapon like Lady Gaga needs another outfit," said Representative Ed Markey, a Democrat who wants Congress to scrap what he calls "unnecessary weapons."

With the Pentagon forced to cut at least $450 billion (330 billion euros) in spending over the next 10 years and possibly another $600 billion if Congress fails to agree a deal on slashing the deficit, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta is looking for potential savings in the nuclear force's budget.

"Our top priority is maintaining a nuclear deterrent, but the arsenal may not need to be as large as it is," said Pentagon press secretary George Little.

But it was too early to say what cuts might be pursued because "this is in the possibility phase right now," he added.

The Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START) with Russia ratified early this year already calls for scaling back the number of American nuclear warheads and missiles. Under the treaty, the United States has to draw down its current force of 1,790 warheads to an agreed maximum of 1,550.

Reducing the budget for atomic weapons could offer substantial savings for the Pentagon, but exactly how much money is a matter of dispute.

According to Markey, the United States spends more than $50 billion a year on the nuclear force, and he and 64 other Democrats in Congress have called for a cut of $200 billion over the next decade.

"Each submarine carries an estimated 96 nuclear warheads. Each submarine is capable of destroying all of Russia's and China's major cities. Why then do we need all of these weapons?" Markey and his fellow Democrats wrote in a letter last month.

But the government's complicated accounting for the nuclear budget, which is shared between the defense and energy departments, has led to an argument about the precise cost of the arsenal.

Republican Mike Turner, chairman of the House Armed Services Subcommittee on Strategic Forces, says the annual cost of the atomic force is not $50 billion but $21.4 billion.

According to that estimate, the proposed cut of $20 billion backed by Democratic lawmakers would therefore "amount to unilateral and immediate nuclear disarmament by the United States," Turner wrote in a letter to the congressional "supercommittee" tackling the deficit.

The Republican warned that the potential cutback favored by Markey would have "catastrophic impacts to our national security and global security," by undermining maintenance and planned upgrades to atomic weapons.

"No one in the government knows exactly how much has been spent or continues to be spent on nuclear weapons because there is not and has never been a unified, comprehensive budget to monitor all their costs across departments and agencies and over time," according to author Stephen Schwartz, quoted in a blog by Steven Aftergood of the Federation of American Scientists.

The government's accounting fails to take into account a range of costs including overheads, research and development, logistics, intelligence programs and training, Schwartz said.

Turner and other opponents of cutting the arsenal believe US nuclear weapons remain a crucial "deterrent" against potential enemies and that major funding is necessary to ensure the force stays credible.

Arms control advocates, however, say savings could be found without affecting American firepower, by cutting the number of nuclear-armed submarines from 14 to eight while loading more warheads on the remaining vessels.

The Arms Control Association argues "the Pentagon could save tens of billions of dollars on new strategic submarines and bombers while still fielding as many nuclear warheads as already planned."

Republican Senator Tom Coburn has proposed cutting the budget for nuclear weapons by $79 billion over 10 years, partly by reducing and delaying new submarine and bomber projects.

.


Related Links
Learn about nuclear weapons doctrine and defense at SpaceWar.com
Learn about missile defense at SpaceWar.com
All about missiles at SpaceWar.com
Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at SpaceWar.com






Comment on this article via your Facebook, Yahoo, AOL, Hotmail login.

Share this article via these popular social media networks
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit GoogleGoogle








NUKEWARS
Pakistan rejects report of unsafe nukes
Islamabad (AFP) Nov 7, 2011
Pakistan on Sunday angrily rejected a report that it had been moving its nuclear weapons in unsafe conditions, saying nobody should underestimate its capability to defend itself. Two US magazines reported Friday that Pakistan has begun moving its nuclear weapons in low-security vans on congested roads to hide them from US spy agencies, making the weapons more vulnerable to theft by Islamist ... read more


NUKEWARS
Ancient Lunar Dynamo May Explain Magnetized Moon Rocks

Ancient Lunar Dynamo May Explain Magnetized Moon Rocks

Lunar Probe to search for water on Moon

Subtly Shaded Map of Moon Reveals Titanium Treasure Troves

NUKEWARS
NASA Ready for November Launch of Car-Size Mars Rover

Russia fails to revive stranded Mars probe

Russia tries to save stranded Mars probe

Curiosity Drives Canada Back To Mars

NUKEWARS
International rendezvous in Lucca on global space exploration

Shot US lawmaker speaks out in first interview

Orbital Teamed with Three NASA Explorer Mission Finalists

NASA Proposes Orion Spacecraft Test Flight In 2014

NUKEWARS
Second Tiangong-1 And Shenzhou-8 docking to face light interference

Made-in-Chengdu to help Shenzhou spacecraft return

What does the Tiangong 1 space station mean for China

China masters space command, control

NUKEWARS
Campaign Begins For Third Automated Transfer Vehicle Mission To ISS

New Supply Ship Arrives, Departure Preps and Science Under Way

Russian space freighter docks with orbital station

Progress Successfully Docks With ISS

NUKEWARS
ILS and Eutelsat Announce Launch of the W3D Satellite in 2013

The second Soyuz launcher's Fregat upper stage is readied for flight

Arianespace Ends 2011 With Three Launcher Campaigns

Six Astrium satellites on the same flight

NUKEWARS
Three New Planets and a Mystery Object Discovered Outside Our Solar System

Dwarf planet sized up accurately as it blocks light of faint star

Herschel Finds Oceans of Water in Disk of Nearby Star

UH Astronomer Finds Planet in the Process of Forming

NUKEWARS
New metamaterial allows transmission gain while retaining negative refraction property

iPhone 4S making frenzied debut in 15 new markets

Are electron tweezers possible

NASA Develops Super-Black Material That Absorbs Light Across Multiple Wavelength Bands




The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2014 - Space Media Network. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. Privacy Statement