|
. | . |
|
by Staff Writers Paris (AFP) March 31, 2014
A stark warning by UN scientists of menacing climate change prompted demands Monday for urgent action to curb greenhouse-gas emissions even as a global pact remained elusive. Scientists, politicians, envoys and green groups united in calls for faster, more drastic action to avoid the worst-case scenarios of conflict, drought and massive displacement highlighted in the expert report. "The path of tomorrow is undoubtedly determined by our choices today," United Nations climate chief Christiana Figueres said after the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) warned of a "severe, pervasive and irreversible impact" if nothing is done. "This report requires and requests that everyone accelerate and scale up efforts towards a low-carbon world and manage the risks of climate change in order to spare the planet and its people," she said. Activist groups said governments now have all the proof they need that inaction will lead to disaster, as well as the scientific basis on which to plan an appropriate response. Many voiced hope that the dire warning would give impetus to negotiations for a new, global pact on curbing carbon emissions from burning fossil fuels. "The gap between the science and what governments are doing remains huge," said Sandeep Chamling Rai of green group WWF. "Now it is up to people to hold their governments to account, to get them to act purposefully and immediately." The Alliance of Small Island States said the new alert came as no surprise for nations already grappling with sea-level rise, droughts and record-breaking storms. "We hope that it helps convince the international community, particularly those most responsible for climate change, to address the crisis with greater urgency and not at some abstract date in the future but immediately." After a nearly 22-year effort under the auspices of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), negotiators are seeking to sign a new, global pact in Paris next year, to take effect in 2020. The aim is to contain warming to 2.0 degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit) over pre-Industrial Revolution levels, though even this level would require adaptive measures for a changed climate. Countries remain deeply divided on what the deal will look like, what it must contain, how binding its provisions should be and how they will be enforced. - No denial, says US - US Secretary of State John Kerry said the political system must "wake up" to the threat. "Denial of the science is malpractice," he said in a statement. "There are those who say we can't afford to act. But waiting is truly unaffordable. The costs of inaction are catastrophic." The IPCC warned that untamed greenhouse gas emissions may cost trillions of dollars in damage to property and ecosystems, and in bills for shoring up climate defences. For Bjorn Lomborg of the Copenhagen Consensus Centre think-tank, "the best solution is to dramatically ramp up funding for research and development of effective green technology." Today's renewable technology, such as solar and wind energy, required subsidies of at least $100 billion (73 billion euros) per year to become viable. "Innovation can help us developing technologies to provide green energy more cheaply than fossil fuels, and then everyone will adopt them," said Lomborg. In the run-up to the conclusion of this year's global climate negotiations in Lima, Peru, in December, UN chief Ban Ki-moon will host heads of state and government in New York on September 23 "to mobilise action and ambition on climate change". European Climate Commissioner Connie Hedegaard said the world should oppose "hitting the snooze button" on the issue. "Europe is preparing an ambitious reduction target for 2030 to be adopted later this year. I appeal to all major emitters to do the same thing," she said in a statement. Tom Mitchell, a climate expert at Britain's Overseas Development Institute (ODI), cautioned against hopes the Paris meeting will be the definitive solution. "The real challenge is in what happens after 2015," he said in a phone interview with AFP in Tokyo. "If countries say they are going to reduce emissions, what is the architecture for holding countries to account, and ensuring that they are contributing their fair share in the first place?"
Climate change: regional impact The report is part of the fifth overview on global warming by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) since 1988. The document identifies each region's key challenges; options for addressing them; and level of risk from warming of either 2 C (3.6 F) or 4 C (7.2 F) by 2100 compared to pre-industrial levels. This risk is calculated on the basis of present policies for adapting to climate change. AFRICA Challenge: Water stress Risk: High at 2 C, very high at 4 C Options: Smarter use of water resources Challenge: Food shortages Risk: Very high at 2 C and 4 C Options: Stress-tolerant crops, help for small farmers Challenge: Mosquito- and water-borne diseases Risk: Very high at 2 C and 4 C Option: Outbreak early-warning systems, improved sanitation EUROPE Challenge: Flooding in river basis and on coasts Risk: Medium at 2 C, very high at 4 C Options: Improve flood protection Challenge: Water stress in dry regions Risk: High at 2 C, very high at 4 C Options: Reduce water waste, including through irrigation Challenge: Heatwaves and air pollution affecting health Risk: High at 2 C, very high at 4 C Options: Reduce emissions to improve air quality and adapt homes and workplaces for heatwaves. ASIA Challenge: Flood damage to homes and infrastructure Risk: High at 2 C, very high at 4 C Options: More resilient buildings and "selective relocation" Challenge: Deaths from extreme heat Risk: Very high at 2 C and 4 C Options: Strengthen health systems, improve city planning to reduce urban heat buildup Challenge: Malnutrition caused by drought Risk: Medium at 2 C, high at 4 C Options: Beef up vigilance on food supplies, improve disaster preparedness AUSTRALASIA Challenge: Damage to coral reefs and, in Australia, animal and plant species loss Risk: High at 2 C, very high at 4 C Options: Reduce pressures on ecosystems from pollution, tourism and introduced species Challenge: Flooding, and coastal infrastructure lost to rising seas Risk: Medium at 2 C, very high at 4 C Options: Smarter land use to reduce exposure to floods and coastal erosion. NORTH AMERICA Challenge: Wildfires for ecosystems and homes Risk: Very high at 2 C and 4 C Options: Improve fire prevention measures Challenge: Deaths from heatwaves Risk: High at 2 C, very high at 4 C Options: Encourage residential air conditioning, build cooling centres for the vulnerable Challenge: Property and infrastructure damage from extreme rainstorms Risk: High at 2 C, very high at 4 C Options: Install drainage systems that allow water runoff to recharge groundwater resources, easing flood risk CENTRAL AND SOUTH AMERICA Challenge: Water stress in semi-arid areas that depend on glaciers for water supply Risk: Very high at 2 C and 4 C Options: Improve water supply and land use Challenge: Flooding in urban areas from extreme rainfall Risk: Very high at 2 C and 4 C Options: Improve urban flood management, early-warning systems and weather alerts Challenge: Decreased food production and food quality Risk: Very high at 2 C and 4 C Options: Develop drought-resistant crop strains POLAR REGIONS Challenge: Risk to ecosystems from changes to permafrost, snow and ice Risk: High at 2 C , very high at 4C Options: Enhanced monitoring of risk, hunt different species if possible Challenge: Food insecurity and lack of reliable and safe drinking water Risk: Very high at 2 C and 4 C Options: Improve monitoring systems, shift resources, settle elsewhere Challenge: Impact on Arctic communities if climate change happens very fast Risk: Very high at 2 C and 4 C Options: Improve communications, education and training, encourage co-management of ecosystem SMALL ISLANDS Challenge: Loss of homes, farmland, infrastructure and livelihoods from rising seas and storms Risk: High at 2 C, very high at 4 C Options: Boost coastal buffers and improve management of water and soil resources Challenge: Loss of low-lying land in coastal areas from a combination of rising seas and storm surges Risk: Very high at 2 C and 4 C Options: Not constructing new buildings in areas at risk OCEANS Challenge: Decline in fish catches at low latitudes Risk: Medium at 2 C, high at 4 C Options: Flexible management reactive to stock variability, expanding aquaculture Challenge: Biodiversity loss from heat-damaged coral reefs Risk: Very high at 2 C and 4 C Options: Reduce other human-induced stresses like pollution, tourism and fishing Challenge: Damage to coastal ecosystems such as mangroves and sea grass from soil runoff from heavy rain and coastal erosion Risk: High at 2 C, very high at 4 C Options: Reduce soil runoff caused by deforestation SOURCE: "Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability " (Summary for Policymakers)
Related Links Climate Science News - Modeling, Mitigation Adaptation
|
|
The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2014 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. Privacy Statement All images and articles appearing on Space Media Network have been edited or digitally altered in some way. Any requests to remove copyright material will be acted upon in a timely and appropriate manner. Any attempt to extort money from Space Media Network will be ignored and reported to Australian Law Enforcement Agencies as a potential case of financial fraud involving the use of a telephonic carriage device or postal service. |