. 24/7 Space News .
PoliSci: Inflation Cuts Research Budget

US President George W. Bush gestures while speaking to reporters during a meeting of the cabinet at the White House 07 February 2005 in Washington after Bush submitted a 2.5 trillion USD budget to congress. The proposed 2006 budget would cut many domestic programs while boosting defense, with a projected deficit of 390 billion dollars. The proposal, certain to ignite a battle from opposition Democrats, would raise military expenditures 4.8 percent to 419.3 billion dollars and add eight percent to the budget for Homeland Security. On left is Treasury Secretary John Snow. AFP photo by Brendan Smialowski.
by Dee Ann Divis
Senior Science & Technology Editor
Washington (UPI) Feb 07, 2005
Federal funding for basic research will hold steady, which means it will be cut by inflation, under the Bush administration's proposed budget for fiscal year 2006.

The White House figures, released Monday, add some funds and cut some for a net change - if one actually does the math - of less than one-thousandth of 1 percent in the budget proposed for fundamental research at the civilian agencies.

Basic research is part of $132.3 billion proposed for federally funded research and development. The record-setting number is an increase of $773 million over the R&D spending for FY 2005.

A good deal of the R&D money is for more outcome-oriented defense-related work and development programs, however. Though valuable, this generally not the sort of open-ended "poking around in things" that leads to fundamental discover ies.

That sort of activity is supported primarily by civilian agencies, with the National Science Foundation and Department of Energy providing the largest share. NASA also is responsible for a large portion of the basic research budget, though its share often takes the form of large projects.

Information provided by the White House showed an increase of $28 million in actual dollars for civilian science and technology spending. That $28 million is being added to last year's budget of $55.3 billion for fundamental research - a tiny but positive change.

The problem is inflation, while still very low - 3.3 percent last year, according to the Department of Labor - so, over all, basic research lost ground in terms of real spending power.

The NSF was one agency that got a boost - on paper anyway. It received a total of $5.605 billion, an increase of $132 million or 2.4 percent over last year. Taking inflation into accoun t, though, it turns out to be roughly a 1 percent cut.

Not all of the increase is going to new research, either. Part of the budget increase was a program transfer slated to pay for overhead. The Coast Guard transferred to NSF its budget for three ice breakers used primarily to keep the lifeline open to the foundation's research facilities in Antarctica. The ice breakers are valuable, but this means the real increase for new research at NSF was closer to $84 million.

The small increase - and real-dollar decrease - will be felt at the lab level.

"The not-so-good news," Arden Bement, NSF's director, told reporters Monday, is the foundation expects to fund only about 20 percent of the proposals it receives this year. During the 1990s, NSF funded around 30 percent. Bement blamed it on an increasing number of proposals, which is no doubt true, but there also was less money back then and one wonders what a careful analysis would reveal.

The NSF increase was neatly offset by a cut of $137 million to science programs at the Department of Energy. Every other DOE science program took hits, too, with renewable energy research getting cut by $26 million (7 percent), electricity distribution by $17 million (17 percent), nuclear energy by $4 million (1 percent), conservation by $20 million (3 percent) and fossil fuels by $81 million (14 percent).

Even the National Institutes of Health, which has received substantial increases for the past five years, eked out a proposed increase of only $163 million or 1 percent for FY 2006. Its planned increase for next year is paltry compared to that of the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

NIST, part of the Department of Commerce, is slated to receive an increase of $34 million for its intramural laboratories. The request, if granted by Congress, would give the program a total of $485 million ne xt year, an 8 percent increase.

The White House also decided - again - to zero out NIST's Advance Technology Program. Only time will tell if Congress - also again - will put the money back. Also hit was the department's National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, from which the White House proposed to cut $43 million or 11 percent.

Research programs at the Department of the Interior squeaked by with only a $1 million cut, and the Agriculture Department limped out of the budget process with a loss of $200 million for its research programs compared to last year.

That outcome might not be quite as grim as it could have been, because most of those cuts came from block grants and not peer-reviewed research, said Martin Apple, president of the Council of Scientific Society Presidents.

Despite the inflation-driven downward trend, the truth is it could have been worse. It is a tight budget year with the tax cuts and th e war in Iraq eating a hole in the nation's pocketbook. Last year, the Office of Management and Budget had predicted greater cuts.

John Marburger, director of the White House's Office of Science and Technology Policy, looked a bit relieved just before the budget briefing on Monday.

"It's actually pretty good," he told United Press International. "There is an actual increase in non-defense Science and Technology."

All rights reserved. � 2004 United Press International. Sections of the information displayed on this page (dispatches, photographs, logos) are protected by intellectual property rights owned by United Press International. As a consequence, you may not copy, reproduce, modify, transmit, publish, display or in any way commercially exploit any of the content of this section without the prior written consent of United Press International.

Related Links
SpaceDaily
Search SpaceDaily
Subscribe To SpaceDaily Express

Nuclear Safety And Space Safety
Honolulu HI (SPX) Feb 08, 2005
Admiral Hyman Rickover's nuclear reactor safety culture was never a possible model for the Space Shuttle because of major differences between the two programs.



Thanks for being here;
We need your help. The SpaceDaily news network continues to grow but revenues have never been harder to maintain.

With the rise of Ad Blockers, and Facebook - our traditional revenue sources via quality network advertising continues to decline. And unlike so many other news sites, we don't have a paywall - with those annoying usernames and passwords.

Our news coverage takes time and effort to publish 365 days a year.

If you find our news sites informative and useful then please consider becoming a regular supporter or for now make a one off contribution.
SpaceDaily Contributor
$5 Billed Once


credit card or paypal
SpaceDaily Monthly Supporter
$5 Billed Monthly


paypal only














The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2016 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. Privacy Statement All images and articles appearing on Space Media Network have been edited or digitally altered in some way. Any requests to remove copyright material will be acted upon in a timely and appropriate manner. Any attempt to extort money from Space Media Network will be ignored and reported to Australian Law Enforcement Agencies as a potential case of financial fraud involving the use of a telephonic carriage device or postal service.