Subscribe to our free daily newsletters
. 24/7 Space News .




Subscribe to our free daily newsletters



LIFE BEYOND SOL - PART ONE - PART TWO - PART THREE - PART FOUR

Take a look at our own family of gas giants at Planetscapes.com

Too Much Of A Good Thing And You're Gone
by Bruce Moomaw
Cameron Park - May 2, 2000 - As giant planets migrate inwards, they will have a very strong tendency to either fling any small existing inner planets into wildly eccentric orbits (or completely away from the star), or herd them into the star ahead of the giant planet.

In either case, such migrating giants completely sweep away any such small inner planets that form in the star's "Habitable Zone" -- the limited zone of distance in which a planet has a temperature that allows liquid water and life to exist on it.

(Even those planets which might still possess an average distance from the star putting them in the Habitable Zone would be put into wildly eccentric orbits that alternately roast and freeze them.)

Of those stars that do have some sort of planetary system, how many have had that system's chance to sustain life destroyed by this cosmic demolition derby? We don't know for sure.

Only 5 percent of stars seem to have really giant planets -- Jupiter-sized or bigger -- in such close, destructive orbits.

But, as Eric Gaidos has pointed out, many of the remaining stars may lack them not because their Jupiters have stayed at a safe distance, but simply because all their "hot Jupiters" have finished spiraling all the way into the star and been destroyed -- first clearing out all the small inner planets that existed there.

And only in the past few months have we acquired the ability to detect "hot Saturns" -- smaller gas giants that are nevertheless still more than big enough to wreck their inner solar systems. Indeed, Uranus-sized gas giants -- which we can't yet detect at all -- are quite adequate to do that.

Even in those systems where there are terrestrial planets in stable orbits within the Habitable Zone, there are a whole set of possible obstacles to the development of life that have only recently been properly appreciated. First, there is the fact that we don't have any real understanding of the process by which life first appeared (in fact, that lack of understanding is one of the prime motivations in looking for extraterrestrial life).

It is known that life appeared on earth with astonishing speed after the planet's crust became cool enough to allow it (apparently within only a few hundred million years), and the assumption has been that this is strong evidence that the evolution of life out of non-living compounds was automatic and inevitable.

But -- as I noted in my last report -- there is now a serious possibility that life first evolved not on Earth but on Mars (which may have become habitable long before Earth), and was then transferred to Earth by Martian meteorites.

If life took a long time to evolve on Mars, that may serve as evidence that the evolution of life is less inevitable than we had thought.

Even if the evolution of one-celled life is indeed easy, though, it's becoming clear that there are a large number of very serious additional obstacles to that life ever becoming multi celled and complex -- and that laundry list of obstacles was described at the conference by Peter Ward, co-author with Donald Brownlee of the recent famous book "Rare Earth: Why Complex Life is Uncommon in the universe".

Ward and Brownlee think it likely that bacterial life may be very common in the universe, but that "metazoan" (multi celled) life may be very rare (though not non-existent) on other worlds.

As they point out, life itself appeared on earth very quickly, but metazoan life took an amazingly long time to appear -- perhaps three billion years, or two-thirds of Earth's total lifetime up to now.

Why?

  • Click For Part Four




    Thanks for being here;
    We need your help. The SpaceDaily news network continues to grow but revenues have never been harder to maintain.

    With the rise of Ad Blockers, and Facebook - our traditional revenue sources via quality network advertising continues to decline. And unlike so many other news sites, we don't have a paywall - with those annoying usernames and passwords.

    Our news coverage takes time and effort to publish 365 days a year.

    If you find our news sites informative and useful then please consider becoming a regular supporter or for now make a one off contribution.

    SpaceDaily Contributor
    $5 Billed Once


    credit card or paypal
    SpaceDaily Monthly Supporter
    $5 Billed Monthly


    paypal only






    Memory Foam Mattress Review
    Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
    XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News








  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2016 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. Privacy Statement All images and articles appearing on Space Media Network have been edited or digitally altered in some way. Any requests to remove copyright material will be acted upon in a timely and appropriate manner. Any attempt to extort money from Space Media Network will be ignored and reported to Australian Law Enforcement Agencies as a potential case of financial fraud involving the use of a telephonic carriage device or postal service.