In a paper to appear today in the international journal Nature, the international team led by the California Institute of Technology presents evidence that the gamma-ray burst of March 26, 1998 (GRB 980326) is apparently associated with a supernova explosion.

This would then indicate that some gamma-ray bursts are associated with the formation of black holes during the fiery deaths of very massive stars. If true, this would be some of the first direct evidence for what produces gamma-ray bursts.

As a consequence, the team suggests that a burst of gamma rays are seen when one of the jets from the supernova's central black hole is pointed directly toward Earth. Gamma-ray bursts are brilliant flashes of high- energy radiation that occur at seemingly random times and from random places in the sky.

While these objects have been known since 1967, it was only recently demonstrated that these bursts originate from galaxies in the very distant universe and are by far the most brilliant bursts in the universe.

This breakthrough was made possible due to the launch of the Italian- Dutch satellite BeppoSAX in 1996, which for the first time pinpointed the location of the bursts with a sufficient accuracy to enable their detailed studies with ground-based telescopes such as the W. M. Keck Telescope.

Despite the strides, scientists were still left wondering what produces these spectacular explosions. Various theories of their possible origins are still vigorously debated.

There are currently two popular models, both suggesting that the bursts originate in a formation of a black hole. In one model, two massive objects such as neutron stars or black holes (both of which may be end-products of previous supernova explosions) coalesce, forming a single massive black hole.

In the second model, such a black hole is produced in a catastrophic collapse of the core of a massive star. In this model, one then expects two sources of light: the "afterglow" emission from the gamma-ray burst itself and light from the exploding star, a supernova. The afterglow rapidly declines whereas the supernova explosion gains in brightness over a period of a few weeks, and then gradually fades away.

The new study reports on the observations of GRB 980326 carried out at the W. M. Keck Observatory's 10-m telescope located atop Mauna Kea, Hawaii. As in many other cases, a visible light afterglow was found following the burst, which then rapidly faded away. However, the Caltech-led team discovered something never previously observed -- a dramatic rebrightening of optical emission at the position of the gamma-ray burst.

Normally, the optical light of a gamma-ray burst vastly outshines its host galaxy for weeks. When the light from the gamma-ray burst fades, the apparent total brightness remains constant: all that remains is the light from the host galaxy.

Caption Right: Now you see it! Now you Don't! Three optical pictures of the same part of the sky at three different times. Darker colors correspond to brighter objects. The so-called transient afterglow of GRB 980326 (at the center of each image) clearly faded in the first month after the burst. The object at the center image was originally interpreted as the host galaxy. But a very long exposure in December (notice how much clearer star "f" gets) revealed that the "galaxy" disappeared. Not likely! Instead, the object at the middle picture is now argued by Bloom et al. in Nature to be the underlying supernova accompanying the gamma-ray burst. The size of these images on the sky is about the size of a postage stamp as seen across a football field.

Shrinivas R. Kulkarni of the Caltech team explains, "A month after GRB 980326, it looked as though the host galaxy was dominating the light." However, the next time the team observed, some eight months after the burst, the "galaxy" was gone.

"Galaxies do not just disappear, so we were astonished," Kulkarni said. "Clearly, what we were seeing is a new source of light brightening one month and then fading away. This is something quite new."

This unexpected rebrightening is now believed to be due to the underlying supernova created in the explosion of the massive star. The team had also obtained spectra of the object at different times, and that provided additional clues.

"The spectrum of the source right after the burst was blue, which is common," said S. George Djorgovski of Caltech. "But after a month it was very red, which was unexpected.

"That alone suggested that we were looking at some different phenomenon happening at the same location, but with a time delay of a few weeks."

Both the rebrightening and the spectrum changes are naturally explained by the presence of a supernova. The intensity of the apparent re-burst matches the peak brightness of a supernova seen in a distant galaxy, and its red spectrum also has the right color.

This represents the most direct evidence to date in favor of the massive supernova model. In this scenario, a black hole is quickly formed in the center of a massive star whose core is unable to support itself against gravity.

When the star explodes, powerful jets from the central black hole emerge along the original axis of rotation, and gamma rays are created by the jets. If the jets are not pointed toward Earth, then we see only a supernova and the effects of the exploding star. But gamma rays as well as the light from the supernova arrive at Earth if the jets are pointing in our direction.

Joshua S. Bloom, a graduate student at Caltech and lead author of the paper said, "This appears to be the smoking gun for the origin of some gamma-ray bursts, a perfect marriage of the two brightest events in the universe. It is wonderful to be a part of such a discovery."

Gamma-ray bursts, since their discovery some 30 years ago, have over 150 theoretical models about their possible origins, but only a handful can come close to describing the true trigger of the bursts.

"It is possible that there are other causes for gamma-ray bursts such as the coalescence of neutron stars," Bloom said. "Undoubtedly, astronomers will focus on unearthing new classes in the years to come."

Early reports of the results created some excitement in the astronomical community. Two other groups, from universities of Amsterdam and Chicago, in view of the work presented by the Caltech team, have reanalyzed the data on some other gamma-ray bursts. They appear to find good evidence for an underlying supernova in another well-studied gamma-ray burst.

"It is encouraging to have had such a resounding reception to an unexpected result," said Kulkarni. "Even some of the initial skeptics seem to be converted by these results."

Other members of the Caltech team are graduate student A. C. Eichelberger; postdoctoral scholars P. C�t�, J. P. Blakeslee, and S. C. Odewahn; and Assistant Professor F. A. Harrison.

In addition to the members of the Caltech team, the other coauthors include M. Feroci of the BeppoSAX team; D. A. Frail of the National Radio Observatory; A. V. Filippenko, D. C. Leonard, A. G. Reiss, H. Spinrad, D. Stern, A. Bunker, B. Grossan, S. Perlmutter, and R. A. Knop of the University of California at Berkeley; A. Dey of the National Optical Astronomy Observatory; and I. M. Hook of the European Southern Observatory.