. 24/7 Space News .
Is Technology Boon Or Bane For Media?

AFP file image. Journalists carry an injured colleague in Baghdad's Palestine Hotel after it was hit by a shell 08 April 2003. A journalist, a photographer and a cameraman working for the British news agency Reuters were wounded when the 15th and 17th floors of the hotel were struck, blowing out windows as fierce exchanges raged on the 20th day of the US-led war. A US military inquiry exonerating a US tank crew for firing on Palestine Hotel, killing Ukrainian cameraman Taras Protsyuk, 35, and Spanish journalist Jose Couso, 37, was dismissed as a pack of lies by a media watchdog and families of the victims, 13 August 2003. US Central Command said in a statement Tuesday that its probe into the April 8 attack concluded that the tank crew had acted properly when it fired a 120mm shell into an upper floor of the hotel.
by Harbaksh Singh Nanda
Almaty, Kazakhstan (UPI) Apr 25, 2005
With the scale of terrorism growing and with round-the-clock television news coverage, the media are getting less time to react to situations and there is growing pressure on journalists to get it fast and get it right, attendees at a media conference said.

Journalists, politicians and government officials at the fourth Eurasian Media Forum in Almaty wondered if the advent of modern technology was a boon or a bane for reporters covering terrorist incidents. Several journalists at the meeting recounted their experiences while caught between authorities, terrorists and a breaking news story.

Jonathan Charles of the BBC, who covered the school siege in Beslan, Russia, last year, said terrorists had become so media savvy the day was not far when they would want go live on air to spell out their demands.

"They have the latest technology, including camera-equipped mobile phones and satellite phones, and very soon they may send the video clips to the Television channels to air those to save the lives of hostages," he said.

Terrorists are becoming part of media by supplying video clips to television channels and because of the media competition, most channels end up airing their footage.

Mithat Bereket of NTV channel in Turkey who has covered many terrorist incidents, said new technology had also put pressure on the government to be more candid.

"The governments must release the true and correct information because it will be out sooner or later anyway," he said.

When governments don't provide accurate information, the media have to rely on whatever they can, he said, adding the objectivity of the reporting during such incidents depends on the reporters on the scene.

"You have to decide if no news is better than the lives of the hostages," he said.

Charles said Russian authorities lied about the number of hostages in Beslan. While local media reported 400 hostages, international media knew the government was lying because of the number of parents waiting outside the seized school.

"You can control the national press but not the global media in today's information age," he said, adding the media must only use only those pictures of hostages where captives are treated with dignity.

Michael Gordon, publisher of New York Times, said violence over the past four years was nothing compared to the events of World War II, but the speed of dissemination of information had made the difference while covering terrorist acts. A lack of accurate government information, he said, could also lead to rumors. He cited the example of a rumor following the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on the United States that wrongly said Jews knew about the impending attack and were asked to stay away from work in the World Trade Center that day.

Vitaliy Tretyakov, president of the International anti-terror Media Forum, said Russia did err in meeting challenges of dissemination of information in Beslan, but any government in the same situation would be trying to save the lives of hostages rather than conducting a media-relations exercise.

Former U.S. Assistant Secretary of Defense, Richard Perle said that: "Like governments, terrorists have come to use the media to put their views across to the world."

He said governments should not control the media that cover such incidents but a caution can always be issued if authorities feel the dissemination of some information can benefit the interests of terrorists.

He cited the U.S. example where restraint or caution is sometimes issued to editors over some news events.

"We do not manipulate media coverage. We do not have legal powers to control media but we do issue restraint calls," Perle said.

Perle said a trend was emerging where journalists were invited by terrorists to cover impending incidents. He could not substantiate the charge but asked how many cameras were out accidentally where incidents have occurred.

Charles said the new technology was a double-edged sword for the media. It does make it easy to report but can put a reporter in a tight spot where he maybe asked by a terrorist to go live on air or else.

More than 300 politicians, diplomats, academicians and journalists from international media attended the fourth chapter of annual Eurasian Media Forum organized in the financial capital of Kazakhstan. The Forum seeks to promote East-West cooperation and international understanding of Eurasian issues through dialogue between the media, the business community, politicians and academics.

Other issues discussed included tsunami coverage, the revolutions in Central Asia, the role of Arab media and AIDS reporting.

All rights reserved. � 2005 United Press International. Sections of the information displayed on this page (dispatches, photographs, logos) are protected by intellectual property rights owned by United Press International. As a consequence, you may not copy, reproduce, modify, transmit, publish, display or in any way commercially exploit any of the content of this section without the prior written consent of United Press International.

Related Links
SpaceDaily
Search SpaceDaily
Subscribe To SpaceDaily Express

Satellite Equipped With Anti-Jamming Feature: APT
Beijing (XNA) Apr 15, 2005
APSTAR VI satellite launched Tuesday from southwestern China is equipped with anti-jamming feature, according to a press release issued by the Hong Kong-based APT Satellite Holdings Limited, which owns the satellite.



Thanks for being here;
We need your help. The SpaceDaily news network continues to grow but revenues have never been harder to maintain.

With the rise of Ad Blockers, and Facebook - our traditional revenue sources via quality network advertising continues to decline. And unlike so many other news sites, we don't have a paywall - with those annoying usernames and passwords.

Our news coverage takes time and effort to publish 365 days a year.

If you find our news sites informative and useful then please consider becoming a regular supporter or for now make a one off contribution.
SpaceDaily Contributor
$5 Billed Once


credit card or paypal
SpaceDaily Monthly Supporter
$5 Billed Monthly


paypal only














The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2016 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. Privacy Statement All images and articles appearing on Space Media Network have been edited or digitally altered in some way. Any requests to remove copyright material will be acted upon in a timely and appropriate manner. Any attempt to extort money from Space Media Network will be ignored and reported to Australian Law Enforcement Agencies as a potential case of financial fraud involving the use of a telephonic carriage device or postal service.